Valley(27) @ (41)Minford
Valley(27) @ (41)Minford
Who wins the big rival matchup?
Taking Valley by 6
Taking Valley by 6
"you miss 100% of the shots you don't take. Wayne Gretzky"
Michael Scott
Michael Scott
-
- SEOPS
- Posts: 6350
- Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 10:01 am
Re: WK10 (3-6) Valley @ (3-6) Minford
Big game for both programs for both momentum and to not finish dead last in the conference.
I have watched both play vs Burg. I think its a coin flip and one or two turnovers will definitely be the difference. Both teams struggle at the LOS on offense but I was impressed in how hard Valley played against Burg. They seem quicker than Minford overall and played very hard. That may be the edge they have over the Falcons this year.
I have watched both play vs Burg. I think its a coin flip and one or two turnovers will definitely be the difference. Both teams struggle at the LOS on offense but I was impressed in how hard Valley played against Burg. They seem quicker than Minford overall and played very hard. That may be the edge they have over the Falcons this year.
-
- S
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2015 7:47 am
- Location: Chicago
Re: WK10 (3-6) Valley @ (3-6) Minford
I kind of like Valley in this one as well. Home game for Minford, but will still take Valley.
Re: WK10 (3-6) Valley @ (3-6) Minford
This should be a real nice match-up. Perhaps Minford has a little more incentive after how this game played out last year.
I give a slight edge to Valley but this game could go either way. Is JT Ward back playing for Valley?
I give a slight edge to Valley but this game could go either way. Is JT Ward back playing for Valley?
Re: WK10 (3-6) Valley @ (3-6) Minford
Yes he played Friday nighttoast wrote: Mon Oct 23, 2017 6:58 pm This should be a real nice match-up. Perhaps Minford has a little more incentive after how this game played out last year.
I give a slight edge to Valley but this game could go either way. Is JT Ward back playing for Valley?
Re: WK10 (3-6) Valley @ (3-6) Minford
Heard that there might be some changes at QB Friday night for the Falcons. Should be interesting to say the least.
-
- Waterboy
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2017 10:37 am
Re: WK10 (3-6) Valley @ (3-6) Minford
35-14 valley gets the lead early and minford struggles to convert in the red zone
-
- Riding the Bench
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2017 12:47 pm
Re: WK10 (3-6) Valley @ (3-6) Minford
There seems to be a lot of talk between Valley fans on this thread, but no comments from Minford fans. I believe this is going to be a great game between two teams that have struggled this year, but pounding your chest over a 3-6 record for either team is a joke!
-
- SEO
- Posts: 2974
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 3:07 pm
-
- Riding the Bench
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2017 12:47 pm
Re: WK10 (3-6) Valley @ (3-6) Minford
Thanks Brother! Even with our less than expected records for the season, I still expect this to be the epic Lucasville-Minford Road battle that we have come to look forward to every year between our teams. Here's to a great competitive game and everyone staying healthy to begin basketball season.
Re: WK10 (3-6) Valley @ (3-6) Minford
So are they going with the freshman that was so good last year? He's one heck of an athlete that's for sure.falcon117 wrote: Mon Oct 23, 2017 11:37 pm Heard that there might be some changes at QB Friday night for the Falcons. Should be interesting to say the least.
Re: WK10 (3-6) Valley @ (3-6) Minford
^ I agree, this kid is the real deal! If the Freshman QB starts then I'll give the edge to the Falcons. If so, good move by coaching staff, this will give the youngster some experience heading into next year.
The best things in life: To Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!- Conan the Barbarian
-
- SEO
- Posts: 2974
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 3:07 pm
Re: WK10 (3-6) Valley @ (3-6) Minford
So you give the advantage to a team with a first time starter that is a freshman at quarterback? If he makes Minford that much better then why has he not played until week 10?vladimir wrote: Tue Oct 24, 2017 1:04 pm ^ I agree, this kid is the real deal! If the Freshman QB starts then I'll give the edge to the Falcons. If so, good move by coaching staff, this will give the youngster some experience heading into next year.
Re: WK10 (3-6) Valley @ (3-6) Minford
I heard they were going to look at the sophomore and freshman at QB. I said they should have started the freshman from the beginning but what do I knowtoast wrote: Tue Oct 24, 2017 12:19 pmSo are they going with the freshman that was so good last year? He's one heck of an athlete that's for sure.falcon117 wrote: Mon Oct 23, 2017 11:37 pm Heard that there might be some changes at QB Friday night for the Falcons. Should be interesting to say the least.
Re: WK10 (3-6) Valley @ (3-6) Minford
From what I understand, the coaching staff was intrigued with Kelley's speed for the QB position. They thought he could provide a balanced run/pass game. However, the passing aspect of his game has struggled in the past few weeks so I think the coaches are wanting to look at different options for next year. The freshman has a cannon for an arm. By far the best on the team. The sophomore may have the best pocket presence out of the 3 but is the slowest by far.Crab's Brother wrote: Tue Oct 24, 2017 1:56 pmSo you give the advantage to a team with a first time starter that is a freshman at quarterback? If he makes Minford that much better then why has he not played until week 10?vladimir wrote: Tue Oct 24, 2017 1:04 pm ^ I agree, this kid is the real deal! If the Freshman QB starts then I'll give the edge to the Falcons. If so, good move by coaching staff, this will give the youngster some experience heading into next year.
Re: WK10 (3-6) Valley @ (3-6) Minford
Time for Minford to shine.
GO LOGAN..The anti-Christ is among us
Re: WK10 (3-6) Valley @ (3-6) Minford
Who wouldve thought at the begining of the season that both of these teams would end up with losing records.
Re: WK10 (3-6) Valley @ (3-6) Minford
That's very good question. IMO, he should have been starting since week 4. Cannon for an arm and very good speed. He should be fun to watch the next 3-yrs.Crab's Brother wrote: Tue Oct 24, 2017 1:56 pmIf he makes Minford that much better then why has he not played until week 10?vladimir wrote: Tue Oct 24, 2017 1:04 pm ^ I agree, this kid is the real deal! If the Freshman QB starts then I'll give the edge to the Falcons. If so, good move by coaching staff, this will give the youngster some experience heading into next year.
The best things in life: To Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women!- Conan the Barbarian
-
- SEOPS
- Posts: 6350
- Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 10:01 am
Re: WK10 (3-6) Valley @ (3-6) Minford
They had a QB under contractCrab's Brother wrote: Tue Oct 24, 2017 1:56 pmSo you give the advantage to a team with a first time starter that is a freshman at quarterback? If he makes Minford that much better then why has he not played until week 10?vladimir wrote: Tue Oct 24, 2017 1:04 pm ^ I agree, this kid is the real deal! If the Freshman QB starts then I'll give the edge to the Falcons. If so, good move by coaching staff, this will give the youngster some experience heading into next year.

-
- Riding the Bench
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2017 12:47 pm
Re: WK10 (3-6) Valley @ (3-6) Minford
Each program has some good young talent coming up through the ranks and I think many people thought that this would be a down yearnoles_fan wrote: Tue Oct 24, 2017 7:06 pm Who wouldve thought at the begining of the season that both of these teams would end up with losing records.
for both schools. I doubt that we expected a 3-7 or 4-6 (at best) record, but the future looks brighter for Valley and Minford over the next
couple years.