#8 Manchester vs. #1 Coalgrove 2/27

Waterboy
Freshman Team
Posts: 137
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 9:34 am

#8 Manchester vs. #1 Coalgrove 2/27

Post by Waterboy »

What's everyone's thoughts? I'll say Coalgrove by 10.


I’m a neutral fannnnn of every one in southern ohio
The Flash
Varsity
Posts: 458
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2017 3:27 pm

Re: #8 Manchester vs. #1 Coal Grove 2/27

Post by The Flash »

Not an easy first round opponent for Coal Grove but they should take care of business. I agree with a 10 pt margin


BigBlueNation
SEOP
Posts: 3205
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 8:50 am
Location: Scioto County

Re: #8 Manchester vs. #1 Coalgrove 2/27

Post by BigBlueNation »

The Grove wins big in this one by 20 or more.


Mailman
All Conference
Posts: 779
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 9:43 pm
Location: Southern Ohio

Re: #8 Manchester vs. #1 Coalgrove 2/27

Post by Mailman »

Coalgrove by 40


CGFAN#1
Freshman Team
Posts: 119
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2017 2:00 pm

Re: #8 Manchester vs. #1 Coalgrove 2/27

Post by CGFAN#1 »

Could be interesting now that the Manchester team is healthy. Think Coal Grove's team defense will be the difference. CG by 10.
Go Big Grove!


Gator B Long
Freshman Team
Posts: 158
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2017 9:53 pm

Re: #8 Manchester vs. #1 Coalgrove 2/27

Post by Gator B Long »

CG has been shaky since Oak Hill win. Better guard Utterback. A healthy Utterback makes them a lot better than #8.


Sopump33
Waterboy
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2018 6:37 pm

Re: #8 Manchester vs. #1 Coalgrove 2/27

Post by Sopump33 »

CG beast ND by 40! It could have been a lot worse.. Manchester barely won. It shouldn’t be a contest..


The Flash
Varsity
Posts: 458
Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2017 3:27 pm

Re: #8 Manchester vs. #1 Coalgrove 2/27

Post by The Flash »

Sopump33 wrote: Wed Feb 21, 2018 8:25 pm CG beast ND by 40! It could have been a lot worse.. Manchester barely won. It shouldn’t be a contest..
Manchester’s arguably two best players also didn’t play much of the season..


Sopump33
Waterboy
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2018 6:37 pm

Re: #8 Manchester vs. #1 Coalgrove 2/27

Post by Sopump33 »

I’m just saying I watched both teams play one was a blow out and one wasn’t


Ironman92
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 30991
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:04 am

Re: #8 Manchester vs. #1 Coalgrove 2/27

Post by Ironman92 »

Gator B Long wrote: Wed Feb 21, 2018 8:22 pm CG has been shaky since Oak Hill win. Better guard Utterback. A healthy Utterback makes them a lot better than #8.
Not in this sectional. He helps but a decent gap between #8 and #7 this year


Ironman92
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 30991
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:04 am

Re: #8 Manchester vs. #1 Coalgrove 2/27

Post by Ironman92 »

Coal Grove by 17


Waterboy
Freshman Team
Posts: 137
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 9:34 am

Re: #8 Manchester vs. #1 Coalgrove 2/27

Post by Waterboy »

Mailman wrote: Wed Feb 21, 2018 7:53 pm Coalgrove by 40
A little far fetched calling it by 40 . It's tournament time could go either way .


I’m a neutral fannnnn of every one in southern ohio
Sopump33
Waterboy
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2018 6:37 pm

Re: #8 Manchester vs. #1 Coalgrove 2/27

Post by Sopump33 »

39!


Mailman
All Conference
Posts: 779
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 9:43 pm
Location: Southern Ohio

Re: #8 Manchester vs. #1 Coalgrove 2/27

Post by Mailman »

Waterboy wrote: Wed Feb 21, 2018 8:41 pm
Mailman wrote: Wed Feb 21, 2018 7:53 pm Coalgrove by 40
A little far fetched calling it by 40 . It's tournament time could go either way .
Don’t think it’s far fetched at all. Coalgrove could have beaten ND by a lot more than 38, and ND played well. Notre Dame played as bad as I’ve seen in the last month and Manchester shot the lights out, and they still only won by 5. Now maybe Coalgrove calls the dogs off and wins by 20-25 but they could win by 40.
Last edited by Mailman on Wed Feb 21, 2018 8:59 pm, edited 2 times in total.


User avatar
Raider6309
SEOPS HOF
Posts: 12987
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 2:00 pm
Location: Athens

Re: #8 Manchester vs. #1 Coalgrove 2/27

Post by Raider6309 »

Waterboy wrote: Wed Feb 21, 2018 8:41 pm
Mailman wrote: Wed Feb 21, 2018 7:53 pm Coalgrove by 40
A little far fetched calling it by 40 . It's tournament time could go either way .
I know. I'm thinking by only 33


Ironman92
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 30991
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:04 am

Re: #8 Manchester vs. #1 Coalgrove 2/27

Post by Ironman92 »

I think they’ve earned the right to be listed as Coal Grove by everyone on here.


Waterboy
Freshman Team
Posts: 137
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 9:34 am

Re: #8 Manchester vs. #1 Coalgrove 2/27

Post by Waterboy »

Ironman92 wrote: Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:03 pm I think they’ve earned the right to be listed as Coal Grove by everyone on here.
??? It is "THE"Coalgrove hornets . I'm not sure I've ever met anyone who calls them Dawson Bryant anymore unless they're from the north!


I’m a neutral fannnnn of every one in southern ohio
Ironman92
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 30991
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 11:04 am

Re: #8 Manchester vs. #1 Coalgrove 2/27

Post by Ironman92 »

Waterboy wrote: Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:08 pm
Ironman92 wrote: Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:03 pm I think they’ve earned the right to be listed as Coal Grove by everyone on here.
??? It is "THE"Coalgrove hornets . I'm not sure I've ever met anyone who calls them Dawson Bryant anymore unless they're from the north!
That’s fine.

Coalgrove 66
Man Chester 45


User avatar
NewEra
All Conference
Posts: 849
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 10:04 pm
Location: Hickory, Indiana - I know everything there is to know about the greatest game ever invented.

Re: #8 Manchester vs. #1 Coalgrove 2/27

Post by NewEra »

If Combs and Utterback play well could be interesting. Ghould needs a good defensive and rebounding performance as well.


allOhiotraveler
Freshman Team
Posts: 163
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 5:19 pm

Re: #8 Manchester vs. #1 Coalgrove 2/27

Post by allOhiotraveler »

How legit is this Coal Grove team? Is it unreasonable for them to be eyeing the Schott? Someone has to make it out of this regional.. I'll be interested on who that team is.


Post Reply

Return to “Boys Basketball”