Oak wrote: Tue Jun 12, 2018 10:54 pm Wheelersburg sports in general but predominantly basketball and football.
Ok , wasn't sure because Oak Hill Oaks basketball team was an aau team.
Oak wrote: Tue Jun 12, 2018 10:54 pm Wheelersburg sports in general but predominantly basketball and football.
I can clarify that. Your forum name is Oak. Most assume you’re an Oak Hill fan. You are accusing burg as recruiting, which is strange when Oak Hill basketball has had plenty of teams with students out of district come play over the years for Oak hills coach.Oak wrote: Tue Jun 12, 2018 11:42 pm Not sure what Oak Hill has to do with this subject. In my opinion any kind of recruiting is wrong.
If that’s proven, the student could possibly be ruled ineligible. Doubt anything happens to the person enticing. Where’s the students parent in this equation?Injun wrote: Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:02 am So what would happen if it was proven that someone that isn't an employee of the school was giving benefits to a player or his family to entice them to go to a school?
Just because you hear it doesn’t mean there is any truth to itInjun wrote: Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:58 am From some things I've heard it sounds like a fairly legitimate question.
art_vandelay wrote: Wed Jun 13, 2018 11:53 am I've been at Shawnee Summer League basketball games last couple of weeks. You start getting to know parents from other schools after being there every week for 3+ hours as well as from playing against the same athletes in other sports. I've already heard a couple of conversations between parents containing half-joking comments like "your boy would look pretty good at (insert school here)." Is that recruiting? I don't think so. The AAU basketball/travel baseball scene is the same way. Now if those casual conversations turn into regular conversations with coaches involved or having knowledge, then yeah, call it recruiting.
As for this thread, the Burg paranoia right now is off the charts. Yeah, they are gonna dominate SOC II football and basketball next year. But talk of them leaving the conference is wishful thinking. Minford baseball (and Valley as well) is finally doing something about Burg's baseball dominance. What is stopping other SOC II schools from doing the same in football? As for me, I think the Holden/Salyers combo is just that special combo that doesn't come along too often at D4-D5 schools. After they graduate, Burg still likely the yearly favorite in football, but the league will be a lot more competitive and these threads will hopefully be a thing of the past.*
14U wrote: Fri Aug 10, 2018 10:11 am Looking at SOC II schedules I think Burg holds the best schedule but the others are right behind them in power of schedule. I put waverly #3 because they are a bigger school and the schedule they have is who they should be playing every year!!
1. Burg
2. Valley
3. Waverly
4. Minford
5. West
Zane Trace and Unioto makes sense.Kicker. wrote: Fri Aug 10, 2018 12:35 pm14U wrote: Fri Aug 10, 2018 10:11 am Looking at SOC II schedules I think Burg holds the best schedule but the others are right behind them in power of schedule. I put waverly #3 because they are a bigger school and the schedule they have is who they should be playing every year!!
1. Burg
2. Valley
3. Waverly
4. Minford
5. West
Waverly being very picky on who they want to play similar to their size, as they've been playing Zane trace and unioto fairly recently that are close in numbers
I wouldn't say their schedule is brutal or they're playing iron unless some of those teams really improve from last year. Hartley I'll give you that one, and much credit to burg for pulling in that game. The others let's look at the scores, Ironton 48-3, Heath 41-0, Waterson 47-17, and Jackson 38-14. I look for ironton and Jackson to be improved but to close that much of a gap probably not.Omega wrote: Fri Aug 10, 2018 11:35 am Wheelersburg 's non conference schedule is brutal for a D5 team, but iron sharpens iron. The other teams skeds are middle of the road in terms of difficulty.