Agreed. We have plenty of respect for Waterford. Fort Frye is just better and should win. This is one of the games The Cadets have a real chance of losing in 2018. They know it, so Fort Frye's kids should be up for this game.EasternDspy wrote: Sat Sep 01, 2018 10:00 pmIt won’t be that bad the Wildcats will play tough they really want it.
Fort Frye 22 Waterford 20
Re: WK 3: Waterford (2-0) @ Fort Frye (2-0)
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18899
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 3: Waterford (2-0) @ Fort Frye (2-0)
Land Sharks will control this one. Coach Huck will not let these boys get over confident.
Re: WK 3: Waterford (2-0) @ Fort Frye (2-0)
One team will be undefeated afterward, the Other will be Waterford. Fort better in nearly all areas.
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 3730
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:41 pm
- Location: Amanda, OH
Re: WK 3: Waterford (2-0) @ Fort Frye (2-0)
They can use the remainder of the season to prepare for Newark Catholic.wagner97 wrote: Sun Sep 02, 2018 12:32 am One team will be undefeated afterward, the Other will be Waterford. Fort better in nearly all areas.
-
- SEOPS
- Posts: 5077
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 11:14 pm
- Location: NORTH OF EDEN
Re: WK 3: Waterford (2-0) @ Fort Frye (2-0)
The boys on the North side of the bridge of the mighty Muskingum beat the South again. Fort Frye by 14.
"ONCE A MARINE, ALWAYS A MARINE"
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18899
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 3: Waterford (2-0) @ Fort Frye (2-0)
2008
Waterford 0
Fort Frye 14
2009
Fort Frye 35
Waterford 6
2010
Waterford 0
Fort Frye 27
2011
Fort Frye 34
Waterford 0
2012
Waterford 13
Fort Frye 63
2013
Fort Frye 47
Waterford 0
2014
Waterford 6
Fort Frye 36
2015
Fort Frye 27
Waterford 0
2016
Waterford 14
Fort Frye 35
2017
Fort Frye 23
Waterford 19
Totals
Fort Frye (10-0)
Fort Frye 341 34.1 Ppg
Waterford 58 5.8 ppg
Waterford 0
Fort Frye 14
2009
Fort Frye 35
Waterford 6
2010
Waterford 0
Fort Frye 27
2011
Fort Frye 34
Waterford 0
2012
Waterford 13
Fort Frye 63
2013
Fort Frye 47
Waterford 0
2014
Waterford 6
Fort Frye 36
2015
Fort Frye 27
Waterford 0
2016
Waterford 14
Fort Frye 35
2017
Fort Frye 23
Waterford 19
Totals
Fort Frye (10-0)
Fort Frye 341 34.1 Ppg
Waterford 58 5.8 ppg
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18899
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 3: Waterford (2-0) @ Fort Frye (2-0)
Waterford has a good team. Fort Frye has a better team. Fort Frye with the win.
Re: WK 3: Waterford (2-0) @ Fort Frye (2-0)
Fort Frye
"you miss 100% of the shots you don't take. Wayne Gretzky"
Michael Scott
Michael Scott
Re: WK 3: Waterford (2-0) @ Fort Frye (2-0)
Fort frye is loaded. This will be tough for the cats. My question is when you know your loaded with talent you drop warren and pick up fed hocking. Congratulations big improvement!!!
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18899
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 3: Waterford (2-0) @ Fort Frye (2-0)
Cowboy22 wrote: Mon Sep 03, 2018 2:51 pm Fort frye is loaded. This will be tough for the cats. My question is when you know your loaded with talent you drop warren and pick up fed hocking. Congratulations big improvement!!!
[/quote}
Warren dropped Fort Frye
Actually Warren doubled up Week 4 and I guess they signed with Cambridge first. Fort had little options due to it being so late it was play Federal Hocking or not play at all
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18899
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 3: Waterford (2-0) @ Fort Frye (2-0)
Fort has 4 league games plus Waterford. Non league opponents Johnstown Barnesville and Central Catholic are ok. Belpre and Fed hocking must be replaced. You've been a playoff team for 3 soon to be 4 straight years.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18899
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 3: Waterford (2-0) @ Fort Frye (2-0)
Belpre won’t be coming off. Northridge series is up. SCC and Barnesville are both up and I hope we renew them.Cowboy22 wrote: Mon Sep 03, 2018 3:56 pm Fort has 4 league games plus Waterford. Non league opponents Johnstown Barnesville and Central Catholic are ok. Belpre and Fed hocking must be replaced. You've been a playoff team for 3 soon to be 4 straight years.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18899
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 3: Waterford (2-0) @ Fort Frye (2-0)
I guess some bigger D4 teams want to play us but I don’t get the need for that. Teams I’d like to see added are Magnolia, Union Local , Marietta ,or Williamstown.EasternDspy wrote: Mon Sep 03, 2018 3:59 pmBelpre won’t be coming off. Northridge series is up. SCC and Barnesville are both up and I hope we renew them.Cowboy22 wrote: Mon Sep 03, 2018 3:56 pm Fort has 4 league games plus Waterford. Non league opponents Johnstown Barnesville and Central Catholic are ok. Belpre and Fed hocking must be replaced. You've been a playoff team for 3 soon to be 4 straight years.
Re: WK 3: Waterford (2-0) @ Fort Frye (2-0)
I'd rather lose to a mid-level division 4 team than blow out hapless Federal Hocking. If they're a playoff team and you're just going to get people hurt, that's a different story.EasternDspy wrote: Mon Sep 03, 2018 4:00 pmI guess some bigger D4 teams want to play us but I don’t get the need for that. Teams I’d like to see added are Magnolia, Union Local , Marietta ,or Williamstown.EasternDspy wrote: Mon Sep 03, 2018 3:59 pmBelpre won’t be coming off. Northridge series is up. SCC and Barnesville are both up and I hope we renew them.Cowboy22 wrote: Mon Sep 03, 2018 3:56 pm Fort has 4 league games plus Waterford. Non league opponents Johnstown Barnesville and Central Catholic are ok. Belpre and Fed hocking must be replaced. You've been a playoff team for 3 soon to be 4 straight years.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18899
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 3: Waterford (2-0) @ Fort Frye (2-0)
efarns wrote: Mon Sep 03, 2018 4:45 pmI'd rather lose to a mid-level division 4 team than blow out hapless Federal Hocking. If they're a playoff team and you're just going to get people hurt, that's a different story.EasternDspy wrote: Mon Sep 03, 2018 4:00 pmI guess some bigger D4 teams want to play us but I don’t get the need for that. Teams I’d like to see added are Magnolia, Union Local , Marietta ,or Williamstown.EasternDspy wrote: Mon Sep 03, 2018 3:59 pm
Belpre won’t be coming off. Northridge series is up. SCC and Barnesville are both up and I hope we renew them.
They found out in May that Warren was backing out. It was either play Federal Hocking or not have a game. Nobody wants to go 2 weeks between games.
Re: WK 3: Waterford (2-0) @ Fort Frye (2-0)
Agree w/thatEasternDspy wrote: Mon Sep 03, 2018 5:33 pmefarns wrote: Mon Sep 03, 2018 4:45 pmI'd rather lose to a mid-level division 4 team than blow out hapless Federal Hocking. If they're a playoff team and you're just going to get people hurt, that's a different story.EasternDspy wrote: Mon Sep 03, 2018 4:00 pm
I guess some bigger D4 teams want to play us but I don’t get the need for that. Teams I’d like to see added are Magnolia, Union Local , Marietta ,or Williamstown.
They found out in May that Warren was backing out. It was either play Federal Hocking or not have a game. Nobody wants to go 2 weeks between games.
Go Wildcats
Re: WK 3: Waterford (2-0) @ Fort Frye (2-0)
The other observation I can make about Fort Frye is their clean execution the first two weeks. I can't think of many busted plays, fumbled snaps, or other silly miscues. I remember they started slow last year.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18899
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 3: Waterford (2-0) @ Fort Frye (2-0)
Haven’t really busted any big plays either. That’s why the scores have been low a bunch of 7-10 play drives.efarns wrote: Mon Sep 03, 2018 10:31 pm The other observation I can make about Fort Frye is their clean execution the first two weeks. I can't think of many busted plays, fumbled snaps, or other silly miscues. I remember they started slow last year.