Wheelersburg 49 Waverly 0

[Poo Bear]

Massie destroyed Western Brown last night, who took Jackson to the test, who Wheelersburg beat with ease. I know you shouldn't compare scores but after the thumping Burg put on Waverly last night I'd say they want no part of Massie.

Nor does wheelersburg. Massie beat Hartley who destroyed wheelersburg. Massie would put a running clock on wheelersburg.

Never said they did, now did I? Besides, we won't see them but Waverly might. Good luck with that.

Agree just a different level than area schools

[fbnut]

Nor does wheelersburg. Massie beat Hartley who destroyed wheelersburg. Massie would put a running clock on wheelersburg.

Never said they did, now did I? Besides, we won't see them but Waverly might. Good luck with that.

Agree just a different level than area schools

Interesting that hartleys 2 losses are on the road, a 3 hr drive and one Well over an hour on a bus
And Massey’s is on the road well over 2 hours on a bus but yet you think that it highschool kids aren’t affected at all by long bus rides

[Poo Bear]

Never said they did, now did I? Besides, we won't see them but Waverly might. Good luck with that.

Agree just a different level than area schools

Interesting that hartleys 2 losses are on the road, a 3 hr drive and one Well over an hour on a bus
And Massey’s is on the road well over 2 hours on a bus but yet you think that it makes no difference where you play

How far was the drive to Massillon last year ?

[fbnut]

Agree just a different level than area schools

Interesting that hartleys 2 losses are on the road, a 3 hr drive and one Well over an hour on a bus
And Massey’s is on the road well over 2 hours on a bus but yet you think that it makes no difference where you play

How far was the drive to Massillon last year ?

About 3 hrs for Eastwood, 3 1/2 - 4 for burg
I think it was mentioned that in the playoffs both teams travel

[Poo Bear]

Interesting that hartleys 2 losses are on the road, a 3 hr drive and one Well over an hour on a bus
And Massey’s is on the road well over 2 hours on a bus but yet you think that it makes no difference where you play

How far was the drive to Massillon last year ?

About 3 hrs for Eastwood, 3 1/2 - 4 for burg
I think it was mentioned that in the playoffs both teams travel

Who won ?

[fbnut]

How far was the drive to Massillon last year ?

About 3 hrs for Eastwood, 3 1/2 - 4 for burg
I think it was mentioned that in the playoffs both teams travel

Who won ?

Not understanding what your asking both teams traveled
Someone had to win
Wonder if that’s why ohsaa tries to find a neutral site an equal travel distance for both teams

[Jolly P(irate)]

How far was the drive to Massillon last year ?

About 3 hrs for Eastwood, 3 1/2 - 4 for burg
I think it was mentioned that in the playoffs both teams travel

Who won ?

Burg went up the day before and stayed in a Hotel. And then we all know the outcome of that one. It must have been the Continental Breakfast.

[Wburgfan]

Travel plays a role on some games. For the game everyone is talking about Burg travelled 2 plus hours on a day which was 90 degrees out on school buses where A/C is not great. I’m sure that effected some kids. Not saying that was the complete reason the game ended the way it did but some could say that played a role. Also many people forget that the game was very close in the second half and burg had a few turnovers which made the score differential larger than the competition on the field.
Many people just get tired of Wheelersburg constant winning will take the shots at them when they can. Not very many give them their due.

[Burgfan/grad85]

Burg 49 Waverly 0 end of story!

[yabbadabbadoo]

Were most of you talking about Hartley beating Burg even at the game? I don't care what anyone says, Hartley got away with holding ALL NIGHT LONG!!!!!


They could not keep the DE's from getting around them so they would just grab them. Stidham and Wilson were held every time they got around the O-line. There was even one poster in the Burg-Hartley thread that made the comment you have to adjust to the no holding calls when you go to Columbus. Just how in the hell do you do that especially if your defense is geared on putting pressure on the QB or in clogging up the back field!!

The biggest no hold call was on the fake punt. The end on that side was getting ready to make the tackle and the O-linemen just hooked him and took him down. Different ballgame IMO if Burg gets the ball there and goes down and scores. they had just put two scores back to back and had Hartley thinking this team can play.

They also held Holden all night on the defensive side. Tanner would put a move on him at the line and get around the guy and he would just reach out and grab Tanner. It was quite pathetic to watch out of a referee crew.


As far as Burg play Clinton Massie, sure they might get beat and they might get beat bad but guess what?? At least Burg has the balls to play a team like that and would fight with them to the very end!!!!!!

[Poo Bear]

Were most of you talking about Hartley beating Burg even at the game? I don't care what anyone says, Hartley got away with holding ALL NIGHT LONG!!!!!


They could not keep the DE's from getting around them so they would just grab them. Stidham and Wilson were held every time they got around the O-line. There was even one poster in the Burg-Hartley thread that made the comment you have to adjust to the no holding calls when you go to Columbus. Just how in the hell do you do that especially if your defense is geared on putting pressure on the QB or in clogging up the back field!!

The biggest no hold call was on the fake punt. The end on that side was getting ready to make the tackle and the O-linemen just hooked him and took him down. Different ballgame IMO if Burg gets the ball there and goes down and scores. they had just put two scores back to back and had Hartley thinking this team can play.

They also held Holden all night on the defensive side. Tanner would put a move on him at the line and get around the guy and he would just reach out and grab Tanner. It was quite pathetic to watch out of a referee crew.


As far as Burg play Clinton Massie, sure they might get beat and they might get beat bad but guess what?? At least Burg has the balls to play a team like that and would fight with them to the very end!!!!!!

Wow . Just wow. You lose by 30 plus and blame the refs. Weak just weak

[yabbadabbadoo]

Were most of you talking about Hartley beating Burg even at the game? I don't care what anyone says, Hartley got away with holding ALL NIGHT LONG!!!!!


They could not keep the DE's from getting around them so they would just grab them. Stidham and Wilson were held every time they got around the O-line. There was even one poster in the Burg-Hartley thread that made the comment you have to adjust to the no holding calls when you go to Columbus. Just how in the hell do you do that especially if your defense is geared on putting pressure on the QB or in clogging up the back field!!

The biggest no hold call was on the fake punt. The end on that side was getting ready to make the tackle and the O-linemen just hooked him and took him down. Different ballgame IMO if Burg gets the ball there and goes down and scores. they had just put two scores back to back and had Hartley thinking this team can play.

They also held Holden all night on the defensive side. Tanner would put a move on him at the line and get around the guy and he would just reach out and grab Tanner. It was quite pathetic to watch out of a referee crew.


As far as Burg play Clinton Massie, sure they might get beat and they might get beat bad but guess what?? At least Burg has the balls to play a team like that and would fight with them to the very end!!!!!!

Wow . Just wow. You lose by 30 plus and blame the refs. Weak just weak

Where in my post did I blame the refs? I just said hartley got away with a lot of holding and had they been called it would have been a closer game and when from someone in Columbus makes a comment about the no calls on holding it just proves my point.


Evidently your team has gotten there butt handed to them by the Burg you still haven;t gotten over that. You seem to love to come on Burg threads and bash the Burg.

[Poo Bear]

Were most of you talking about Hartley beating Burg even at the game? I don't care what anyone says, Hartley got away with holding ALL NIGHT LONG!!!!!


They could not keep the DE's from getting around them so they would just grab them. Stidham and Wilson were held every time they got around the O-line. There was even one poster in the Burg-Hartley thread that made the comment you have to adjust to the no holding calls when you go to Columbus. Just how in the hell do you do that especially if your defense is geared on putting pressure on the QB or in clogging up the back field!!

The biggest no hold call was on the fake punt. The end on that side was getting ready to make the tackle and the O-linemen just hooked him and took him down. Different ballgame IMO if Burg gets the ball there and goes down and scores. they had just put two scores back to back and had Hartley thinking this team can play.

They also held Holden all night on the defensive side. Tanner would put a move on him at the line and get around the guy and he would just reach out and grab Tanner. It was quite pathetic to watch out of a referee crew.


As far as Burg play Clinton Massie, sure they might get beat and they might get beat bad but guess what?? At least Burg has the balls to play a team like that and would fight with them to the very end!!!!!!

Wow . Just wow. You lose by 30 plus and blame the refs. Weak just weak

Where in my post did I blame the refs? I just said hartley got away with a lot of holding and had they been called it would have been a closer game and when from someone in Columbus makes a comment about the no calls on holding it just proves my point.


Evidently your team has gotten there butt handed to them by the Burg you still haven;t gotten over that. You seem to love to come on Burg threads and bash the Burg.

Nope respect for Burg. Just merely made one small statement and this is what followed. Is very entertaining though. Yes my team did lose to Burg but I never once blamed anyone else

[packers80]

Why did Waverly keep kicking to matthews?

[mattash]

Wheelersburg 49 Waverly 0

[RoadMan]

fbnut - illegal equipment could be jewelry, the "live-strong" bands, knots hanging out of a helmet from a bandanna of some sort. It is my understanding that the officials are to ask each HC prior to the game about being legally equipped, then should a player come out wearing something that is not legal they are to penalize them. I have also heard that wearing equipment illegally (chin snaps not snapped, pants not over the knees, no mouthpiece, etc., would lead to play being stopped and the player sent out until legally equipped. I would defer to any official who would like to chime in though.

[14U]

Why did Waverly keep kicking to matthews?

Made no since! Told my buddy why are they kicking to him. One punt they did angle it and it worked for them no return