Mouton is a 3.5 GPA kid. He is very high chracter. He made a mistake.
Thug? Racist remark? Is this a black comment I hope not.
Michigan v. ND
- Speedofsand
- Varsity
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 6:03 pm
Re: Michigan v. ND
Did I say thug ? LMAO, since when does THUG mean BLACK, or RACIST ? You can't twist my words and spin it that easy. Is that what it means in Michigan ? Thug = Black ? Really ?
You have no idea what you are talking about if you call ME a racist, LMAO. If you knew me, you would not post such ignorant nonsense. You are clueless, grow up.
'Mouton is a 3.5 GPA kid. He is very high chracter. He made a mistake.'
You have no idea what you are talking about if you call ME a racist, LMAO. If you knew me, you would not post such ignorant nonsense. You are clueless, grow up.
'Mouton is a 3.5 GPA kid. He is very high chracter. He made a mistake.'
-
- Varsity
- Posts: 604
- Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 4:39 pm
Re: Michigan v. ND
Since when does GPA have any bearing on a person's character? Most serial killers have above avg. IQs. It's irrelevant.
Re: Michigan v. ND
The kid messed up. His coach backed him up. I have no problem with that. I have a problem with his action, but he is not a "thug". The Big Ten had their chance to do something and did not.
Working hard in college while playing a sport and making good grades usually reveals high character kids.
You can stop with the grow up comment it is as lame as all of your supposed comical pictures of Lane Kiffin. He is a douche bag, we all get that.
I am really hurt that a nobody on SEOP has called me clueless
To be honest I do not care to know you, but I would appreciate you actually adding something that is constructive.
Working hard in college while playing a sport and making good grades usually reveals high character kids.
You can stop with the grow up comment it is as lame as all of your supposed comical pictures of Lane Kiffin. He is a douche bag, we all get that.
I am really hurt that a nobody on SEOP has called me clueless
To be honest I do not care to know you, but I would appreciate you actually adding something that is constructive.
- Speedofsand
- Varsity
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2008 6:03 pm
Re: Michigan v. ND
So you think anything that reflects poorly on Michigan football is not constructive. OK peake why dont YOU add something constructive instead of bashing others so much ? Answer my question, does thug = black ? Or were you just trying to bash me ?
I will post less Florida threads on this board. I'll just trash talk schools I hate, like you do.
I will post less Florida threads on this board. I'll just trash talk schools I hate, like you do.
Re: Michigan v. ND
I am very constructive and objective when it comes to other teams. My evaluation of Notre Dame and Ohio State have been pretty spot on. I have not bad mouthed either beside saying TP is not getting better and I hate Fat Charlie. I have been very objective when it comes to Michigan as well.
The Big Ten suspended Mouton for a game, you happy now? Mouton is a very very high character guy, but I do not expect anyone not close to the program to see or know that. He made a mistake and he has been punished. Problem solved. Does it reflect poorly on Michigan, IMO no. He made the mistake, not the University of Michigan. He is being held accountable not the University. Percey Harvin smoked weed while at Florida, does that reflect poorly on the University of Florida or Urban Meyers program? IMO, no. I hope you do not take that last comment out of context and twist it all around. I am merely using Florida as an example because they are your favorite team and you can relate to your own team.
I have never heard a person be referred to as a thug unless they are a certain color. That is my observation. I choose not to use that analogy because of what it infers.
The Big Ten suspended Mouton for a game, you happy now? Mouton is a very very high character guy, but I do not expect anyone not close to the program to see or know that. He made a mistake and he has been punished. Problem solved. Does it reflect poorly on Michigan, IMO no. He made the mistake, not the University of Michigan. He is being held accountable not the University. Percey Harvin smoked weed while at Florida, does that reflect poorly on the University of Florida or Urban Meyers program? IMO, no. I hope you do not take that last comment out of context and twist it all around. I am merely using Florida as an example because they are your favorite team and you can relate to your own team.
I have never heard a person be referred to as a thug unless they are a certain color. That is my observation. I choose not to use that analogy because of what it infers.
Re: Michigan v. ND
As a passer, Pryor is definitely better than last season.
He is just staying in the pocket too much. It seems that he is trying too hard to prove the skeptics wrong, and is forcing himself to throw the ball at all costs.
As for the punch... Meh. Things get heated in football. He should be punished, but afterward, let him go about his business.
He is just staying in the pocket too much. It seems that he is trying too hard to prove the skeptics wrong, and is forcing himself to throw the ball at all costs.
As for the punch... Meh. Things get heated in football. He should be punished, but afterward, let him go about his business.