Don’t believe so. I watched it 3xyabbadabbadoo wrote: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:57 pm That second FT by GM was an air ball and didn’t touch the rim so shouldn’t that have been Waverly’s ball out of bounds on the baseline with 6.6 seconds left?
Great finish though and congrats to Waverly
#5 Waverly vs #4 Greenfield McClain 2/22
Re: #5 Waverly vs #4 Greenfield McClain 2/22
Re: #5 Waverly vs #4 Greenfield McClain 2/22
Crazy tough shot but looked like no hand up on the shot
Re: #5 Waverly vs #4 Greenfield McClain 2/22
Won’t let me see this oneDunn97 wrote: Sat Feb 23, 2019 12:04 am https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_ ... 8&sfnsn=mo
Another good view of Cobe's shot.
Re: #5 Waverly vs #4 Greenfield McClain 2/22
McClain put up a big fight but Waverly guards went for 45. Not surprisedMasterOfNone wrote: Tue Feb 19, 2019 1:17 pmIdk about those 3 totaling for 40+ points. Sounds like McClain has some tough guard play and that would be difficult for Waverly to do. I do believe tho, in order for Waverly to win one of those 3 guards mentioned needs to have 15+ with the second guard coming in around 10. Also, need a 10+ point game from either Wolf or Dunn. I just don't think all three Waverly guards will be able to score that much combined. Although Waverly is a score by committee kind of team, they don't have one guy who can go out and give you 20 a night regularly. Which I think is what makes them dangerous due to the fact anyone can have a big night. But also is a down fall because they don't have that reliable go to scorer.Ed Ott wrote: Mon Feb 18, 2019 10:28 pm McClain doesn’t have the horses to stay with Waverly
Waverly 61
McClain 48
Remington-Robertson-Marquez potentially could outscored McClain. I’ll guess those 3 total 40+ points
Re: #5 Waverly vs #4 Greenfield McClain 2/22
Yeah I would've wanted it made, and honestly I know some like it some don't but had he put McClain up 3 I would've fouled on the inbound. Waverly had no timeouts left and both teams were struggling from the line. Heck I wonder if McClain doesn't clear out and fouls on the rebound if Waverly would've been clutch to hit 2 just to tie it given the magnitude of the game and time left. Doesn't matter, great great game by both teams and a shot Cobe will remember for quite sometime. Heartbreaking for McClain look no farther than free throws in this one as to why they didn't advance, just a tough way to end it. Good Luck to Waverly moving forward looks like you could possibly be on a collision course with Sheridan yet again.smurray wrote: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:26 pmMe too, but just makes one wonder. You go up 3 with a make and assured no less than another OT.Ironman92 wrote: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:17 pmNo way, not with 6.6 left. It barely drew iron. Potentially better off had he missed but I definitely want that to be made.smurray wrote: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:09 pm
I just wonder if he missed it on purpose to make it more difficult for Waverly to get started, easier then an inbounds. I wouldn’t think that was the case but man he missed it bad.
-
- JV Team
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 11:22 am
Re: #5 Waverly vs #4 Greenfield McClain 2/22
It def grazed the rim. Could easily see it live.yabbadabbadoo wrote: Fri Feb 22, 2019 11:57 pm That second FT by GM was an air ball and didn’t touch the rim so shouldn’t that have been Waverly’s ball out of bounds on the baseline with 6.6 seconds left?
Great finish though and congrats to Waverly
Re: #5 Waverly vs #4 Greenfield McClain 2/22
https://youtu.be/IedYk7_D_I0
I see it was posted above!
I have always said less than 10 seconds down 2 you gotta foul if opponent has the ball. You have a much better chance of winning the game. At the line they can only tie and must hit both shots then you have the ball and game is tied, worst that can happen is OT. It has to be coached ahead of time!
I see it was posted above!
I have always said less than 10 seconds down 2 you gotta foul if opponent has the ball. You have a much better chance of winning the game. At the line they can only tie and must hit both shots then you have the ball and game is tied, worst that can happen is OT. It has to be coached ahead of time!
Re: #5 Waverly vs #4 Greenfield McClain 2/22
If they have at least one other guy to rebound instead of just the shooter they would have two guys there to pressure the ball and Cobe doesn’t have a direct uncontested route. Maybe you get the rebound in that situation with a couple guys there. No way does Cobe get to that opportunity if they pressure him.Bigdog wrote: Sat Feb 23, 2019 9:17 am https://youtu.be/IedYk7_D_I0
I see it was posted above!
I have always said less than 10 seconds down 2 you gotta foul if opponent has the ball. You have a much better chance of winning the game. At the line they can only tie and must hit both shots then you have the ball and game is tied, worst that can happen is OT. It has to be coached ahead of time!
I think they concentrated on Robertson not getting the ball and felt there was no way Cobe could get the ball and get a good shot off in time.
Hind sight is 20/20...
Re: #5 Waverly vs #4 Greenfield McClain 2/22
The only guy that could pressure was "accidentally" taken out by Hayden! 

Re: #5 Waverly vs #4 Greenfield McClain 2/22
Exactly, made no sense to have everybody back past half court. But, we’ll gladly take that strategy....Bigdog wrote: Sat Feb 23, 2019 9:43 am The only guy that could pressure was "accidentally" taken out by Hayden!![]()
-
- Varsity
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2017 3:52 pm
Re: #5 Waverly vs #4 Greenfield McClain 2/22
What a ballgame! I don’t think there’s any way you foul and put him on the line...maybe up 3, but no way up 2. I agree on contesting that rebound. You tell your kids not to foul, but rebound the ball if you can. You have to try to get in front of the dribbler at the end and try to get a hand up, but if you foul him he could shoot three free throws and beat you. In any event, it was an AMAZING shot by Marquez! Trey hit two huge ones in the last minute to even give us a chance...big time freshman performance! I was really impressed with Greenfield. That three headed monster they had was impressive. Myschal is relentless and a very impressive athlete. Penwell has quickness like I’ve only seen out of our guy Remington (did you see him go up over Myschal for that rebound on the inbounds play
), and forgive me for not knowing his name...#14...crafty like a fox scoring on any of ways. Best game I’ve seen in a long time!
Re: #5 Waverly vs #4 Greenfield McClain 2/22
You could have the guys in the lane and just tell them not to go for the rebound if you’re concerned about a cheap foul. Just strange coaching, but that shouldn’t take away from the amazing shot by Marquez
Re: #5 Waverly vs #4 Greenfield McClain 2/22
All the what if’s and most of us agree we would have defended differently but Marquez still had to make an incredible once in a lifetime buzzer beating 30’ shot. It’s all a mute point if he doesn’t hit that shot.
Not to mention the two deep threes nailed by Freshman Trey Robertson with .29 to play and 9.3 to play to put the Tigers in that position.
9 points on three shots with under .30 to play.
Not to mention the two deep threes nailed by Freshman Trey Robertson with .29 to play and 9.3 to play to put the Tigers in that position.
9 points on three shots with under .30 to play.
Re: #5 Waverly vs #4 Greenfield McClain 2/22
Trying to post a picture but can’t figure it out. Lol
Last edited by Ukfanatic on Mon Feb 25, 2019 6:08 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
- SEOPS
- Posts: 5056
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Portsmouth HS--15 State Appearances in Boys Basketball--4th All Time in Ohio
Re: #5 Waverly vs #4 Greenfield McClain 2/22
Congratulations to Coach Robertson, his staff, the Tigers on their sectional championship. Also the same to UKfanatic and smurray.
Last edited by trojandave on Mon Feb 25, 2019 12:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.