WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post Reply
dilligaf
S
Posts: 1898
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:06 am

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by dilligaf »

Chaw wrote: Sat Nov 16, 2019 5:57 pm sounds like a bunch of crying to me
I see chaw is still but hurt becuase of the total beating Waterturd took from Trimble.


Happy McGavin
Varsity
Posts: 486
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2018 8:41 pm

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by Happy McGavin »

Just watched the replay, still in shock, but what a great ball game this was to watch live and then again on replay. Hate it for our seniors but they have nothing to hang their heads about. Springfield is an excellent team


Its all in the hips
3rd and one
Waterboy
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2019 4:16 pm

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by 3rd and one »

I heard that Lucky Charms was calling the game for Springfield. Almost champs again.
Last edited by 3rd and one on Sun Nov 17, 2019 5:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Eagle82
All Conference
Posts: 780
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 11:41 am
Location: Eastern(Meigs)

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by Eagle82 »

How come Trimble played in D6? Aren't you guys about the same as us here at Eastern in size?


dilligaf
S
Posts: 1898
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:06 am

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by dilligaf »

Eagle82 wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2019 4:48 pm How come Trimble played in D6? Aren't you guys about the same as us here at Eastern in size?
Trimble has three kids who live right on the line who have played at Trimble all there lives but this they they used the competitive balance to figure Trimbles division.


User avatar
Ground Buck
All Conference
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 8:18 pm

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by Ground Buck »

Hated to see the wee cats lose, but as I predicted they struggled in the passing game when forced to by a good team. One thing is for sure though, they learned that D6 is a lot tougher than D7. Still a great year and nothing to hang your heads about.


Disclaimer: This is all an opinion and I am therefore hoping we can still express opinions on this site without retort.
Superman
JV Team
Posts: 309
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 10:08 pm

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by Superman »

Ground Buck wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 12:10 pm Hated to see the wee cats lose, but as I predicted they struggled in the passing game when forced to by a good team. One thing is for sure though, they learned that D6 is a lot tougher than D7. Still a great year and nothing to hang your heads about.
I know one D6 team that they didn't struggle with.


hsfootballfan77
Waterboy
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2017 6:42 pm
Location: Ohio

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by hsfootballfan77 »

Superman wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 2:26 pm
Ground Buck wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 12:10 pm Hated to see the wee cats lose, but as I predicted they struggled in the passing game when forced to by a good team. One thing is for sure though, they learned that D6 is a lot tougher than D7. Still a great year and nothing to hang your heads about.
I know one D6 team that they didn't struggle with.
Fed Hock! :lol:


Happy McGavin
Varsity
Posts: 486
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2018 8:41 pm

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by Happy McGavin »

Ground Buck wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 12:10 pm Hated to see the wee cats lose, but as I predicted they struggled in the passing game when forced to by a good team. One thing is for sure though, they learned that D6 is a lot tougher than D7. Still a great year and nothing to hang your heads about.
They attempted 4 passes all game and 2 were into the endzone as time was expiring basically you moron.


Its all in the hips
Ed Turdwhittler
Waterboy
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2015 7:01 am

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by Ed Turdwhittler »

Eagle82 wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2019 4:48 pm How come Trimble played in D6? Aren't you guys about the same as us here at Eastern in size?
they would have still been d6 if they didnt get a handful of kids fom fed hock. In a way they re the reason fed lost their program.


dilligaf
S
Posts: 1898
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:06 am

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by dilligaf »

Ed Turdwhittler wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 6:28 pm
Eagle82 wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2019 4:48 pm How come Trimble played in D6? Aren't you guys about the same as us here at Eastern in size?
they would have still been d6 if they didnt get a handful of kids fom fed hock. In a way they re the reason fed lost their program.
There players didnt come from fed hocker :lol: :lol:


User avatar
Raider6309
SEOPS HOF
Posts: 12986
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 2:00 pm
Location: Athens

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by Raider6309 »

Ground Buck wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 12:10 pm Hated to see the wee cats lose, but as I predicted they struggled in the passing game when forced to by a good team. One thing is for sure though, they learned that D6 is a lot tougher than D7. Still a great year and nothing to hang your heads about.
“As I predicted,” makes you sound like Paladin :lol:


dilligaf
S
Posts: 1898
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:06 am

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by dilligaf »

Raider6309 wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 6:46 pm
Ground Buck wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 12:10 pm Hated to see the wee cats lose, but as I predicted they struggled in the passing game when forced to by a good team. One thing is for sure though, they learned that D6 is a lot tougher than D7. Still a great year and nothing to hang your heads about.
“As I predicted,” makes you sound like Paladin :lol:
Paladin want to be lol how sad.


User avatar
Raider6309
SEOPS HOF
Posts: 12986
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 2:00 pm
Location: Athens

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by Raider6309 »

Paladin is getting old, ground chuck might have to be the new Paladin


dilligaf
S
Posts: 1898
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:06 am

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by dilligaf »

Raider6309 wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 6:54 pm Paladin is getting old, ground chuck might have to be the new Paladin
:lol:


Giorgio Tsoukalous
JV Team
Posts: 375
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2019 1:44 am

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by Giorgio Tsoukalous »

Congrats Trimble on a good season!


User avatar
Ground Buck
All Conference
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 8:18 pm

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by Ground Buck »

Raider6309 wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 6:54 pm Paladin is getting old, ground chuck might have to be the new Paladin
WOW! What a compliment. To Paladine that is. :mrgreen:

But really, these jokers on here stoned me when I said the wee cats would struggle to pass against a good team. Then, after two picks in the end zone cost them the game, they try to change the subject. Just pointing out that I knew what I was talking about. But hey, the bright side is in a year or two looks like they'll be back in D7 where they can run the wishbone with ineligible T's instead of TE's as their EMOLOS all the way to the state finals. :mrgreen:


Disclaimer: This is all an opinion and I am therefore hoping we can still express opinions on this site without retort.
dilligaf
S
Posts: 1898
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:06 am

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by dilligaf »

Ground Buck wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2019 11:08 am
Raider6309 wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 6:54 pm Paladin is getting old, ground chuck might have to be the new Paladin
WOW! What a compliment. To Paladine that is. :mrgreen:

But really, these jokers on here stoned me when I said the wee cats would struggle to pass against a good team. Then, after two picks in the end zone cost them the game, they try to change the subject. Just pointing out that I knew what I was talking about. But hey, the bright side is in a year or two looks like they'll be back in D7 where they can run the wishbone with ineligible T's instead of TE's as their EMOLOS all the way to the state finals. :mrgreen:
Finally came out of the hole i see ground suck you seem to be forgetting about the first play off game. Where was you and your stupidity then.


tomcat82
Freshman Team
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 4:46 pm

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by tomcat82 »

Ed Turdwhittler wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 6:28 pm
Eagle82 wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2019 4:48 pm How come Trimble played in D6? Aren't you guys about the same as us here at Eastern in size?
they would have still been d6 if they didnt get a handful of kids fom fed hock. In a way they re the reason fed lost their program.
They came from Morgan .....................nice try...


Happy McGavin
Varsity
Posts: 486
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2018 8:41 pm

Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)

Post by Happy McGavin »

tomcat82 wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2019 2:07 pm
Ed Turdwhittler wrote: Mon Nov 18, 2019 6:28 pm
Eagle82 wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2019 4:48 pm How come Trimble played in D6? Aren't you guys about the same as us here at Eastern in size?
they would have still been d6 if they didnt get a handful of kids fom fed hock. In a way they re the reason fed lost their program.
They came from Morgan .....................nice try...
They've been at Trimble their whole lives so I wouldn't even say they came from Morgan


Its all in the hips
Post Reply

Return to “Football”