Yeah there was no new players same players since little league.Happy McGavin wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 2:47 pmThey've been at Trimble their whole lives so I wouldn't even say they came from Morgantomcat82 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 2:07 pmThey came from Morgan .....................nice try...Ed Turdwhittler wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 6:28 pm
they would have still been d6 if they didnt get a handful of kids fom fed hock. In a way they re the reason fed lost their program.
WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
[/quote]
Yeah there was no new players same players since little league.
[/quote]
That basically backs up the point that Trimble would've been D6 even without competitive balance. They were just bigger this year than other schools. I'm sure they'll drop back down soon. Is it every year or every other year they redo the regions? I can never remember
Yeah there was no new players same players since little league.
[/quote]
That basically backs up the point that Trimble would've been D6 even without competitive balance. They were just bigger this year than other schools. I'm sure they'll drop back down soon. Is it every year or every other year they redo the regions? I can never remember
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
Yeah there was no new players same players since little league.
[/quote]
That basically backs up the point that Trimble would've been D6 even without competitive balance. They were just bigger this year than other schools. I'm sure they'll drop back down soon. Is it every year or every other year they redo the regions? I can never remember
[/quote]
Trimble needs to give Newark catholic a call to find out how to lower your numbers to get back down to d7
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
Yeah there was no new players same players since little league.
[/quote]
That basically backs up the point that Trimble would've been D6 even without competitive balance. They were just bigger this year than other schools. I'm sure they'll drop back down soon. Is it every year or every other year they redo the regions? I can never remember
[
No it doent back up anything Trimble same size as always d-7 just this here they got hit with the c.b rule That rule was made up for inter city schools who have kids all over to recruit Trimble never recruited anyone but i guess its a waste of time trying to explain it on here some people just cant or dont want to understand what happened.
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
Every kid in bishopville goes to Trimble its a 20 mile drive to morgan 3 minute drive to Glouster school. Trimble few kids that put them in c.b. wil be gone this year.
-
- All State
- Posts: 1056
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:24 am
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
CB rosters /numbers run a year behind. The kids on this year's team are being entered now to count for next year's cb number.
https://ohsaa.org/School-Resources/Comp ... rce-Center
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
This argument is so stupid.... Eliminate competitive balance and Trimble is still DVI.
You are bigger than Mogadore and I don't hear them complaining
You are bigger than Mogadore and I don't hear them complaining
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
No one complaining just trying to explain to some on here why they are d-6 havent heard anyone complain about it all year.I do wish we could have knocked you guys out of the playoffs again
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
That basically backs up the point that Trimble would've been D6 even without competitive balance. They were just bigger this year than other schools. I'm sure they'll drop back down soon. Is it every year or every other year they redo the regions? I can never remember
[
No it doent back up anything Trimble same size as always d-7 just this here they got hit with the c.b rule That rule was made up for inter city schools who have kids all over to recruit Trimble never recruited anyone but i guess its a waste of time trying to explain it on here some people just cant or dont want to understand what happened.
[/quote]
I'm not saying they were bigger this year than in years past, you're correct they're the same size. But other schools that were bigger are now smaller than them. Trimble would have been D6 This year even without competitive Balance.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 20590
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 12:49 am
- Location: Next to a lake somewhere
- Contact:
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
Learn how to quote each other people
Championship's are won in the off-season
BUCKEYE PRIDE!
BUCKEYE PRIDE!
-
- Riding the Bench
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2018 4:01 pm
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
Move on buddy, this game is over!
I am not a Burrows fan but, I am a BURROW fan!
- Ground Buck
- All Conference
- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 8:18 pm
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
Are you referring to the couple of prayers they threw up and were lucky to have a receiver in the vicinity?dilligaf wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 1:20 pmFinally came out of the hole i see ground suck you seem to be forgetting about the first play off game. Where was you and your stupidity then.Ground Buck wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 11:08 amWOW! What a compliment. To Paladine that is.Raider6309 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 6:54 pm Paladin is getting old, ground chuck might have to be the new Paladin
But really, these jokers on here stoned me when I said the wee cats would struggle to pass against a good team. Then, after two picks in the end zone cost them the game, they try to change the subject. Just pointing out that I knew what I was talking about. But hey, the bright side is in a year or two looks like they'll be back in D7 where they can run the wishbone with ineligible T's instead of TE's as their EMOLOS all the way to the state finals.
Disclaimer: This is all an opinion and I am therefore hoping we can still express opinions on this site without retort.
- Ground Buck
- All Conference
- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 8:18 pm
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
Yep, roll out the balls.
Disclaimer: This is all an opinion and I am therefore hoping we can still express opinions on this site without retort.
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
Actually NO, it’s the EMIS number that goes off of the last years count, the CB number is fluid and that is why Regions are redrawn every year. Before CB the counts were always 2 year cycles, now schools can change every year.icanpickem wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 10:49 pmCB rosters /numbers run a year behind. The kids on this year's team are being entered now to count for next year's cb number.
https://ohsaa.org/School-Resources/Comp ... rce-Center
-
- All State
- Posts: 1056
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:24 am
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
Tell me how the CB number from this year's fall sports are factored in to the current count when ad's still have a couple of weeks to enter the current fall sports roster into the portal. They run a season behind.Pol pot wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 2:59 amActually NO, it’s the EMIS number that goes off of the last years count, the CB number is fluid and that is why Regions are redrawn every year. Before CB the counts were always 2 year cycles, now schools can change every year.icanpickem wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 10:49 pmCB rosters /numbers run a year behind. The kids on this year's team are being entered now to count for next year's cb number.
https://ohsaa.org/School-Resources/Comp ... rce-Center
- Raider6309
- SEOPS HOF
- Posts: 12987
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 2:00 pm
- Location: Athens
-
- Varsity
- Posts: 486
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2018 8:41 pm
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
Watching Springfield score at will on Mogadore is crazy. Could of, would of, should of for the Tomcats.
Its all in the hips
- Raider6309
- SEOPS HOF
- Posts: 12987
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 2:00 pm
- Location: Athens
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
The only problem is Anna is the best team D5-D7. They are a buzz saw
-
- Varsity
- Posts: 486
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2018 8:41 pm
Re: WK12: 4. Trimble (11-0) vs 1. Springfield (11-0)
You ain't wrong thereRaider6309 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:12 pm The only problem is Anna is the best team D5-D7. They are a buzz saw
Its all in the hips