Buckeye1972 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 17, 2020 12:07 pm
I have never been a fan of "the blame game". (Although I do blame John Cooper for making the 90's the most miserable decade of my life). I believe that every high school coach - either head coach or assistant - tries to give their team every chance to achieve success. I know a number of coaches in various sports at various schools and what they have to put up with is beyond what I would do. I don't think that any coach wants to finish on the short end of a game. Every coach has a different philosophy of what it takes to win. Again, if you compare the talent of ND to West and Northwest, they fall short.
Typically people fall into one of two categories:
1. The coach is the next Bill Belichick. He can win with no talent and if he ever gets some talented players he'll win the state. If the team loses a game it's either bad luck or the players screwed up or the parents and/or administration/school board are interfering.
2. Anyone could win with these players. If they don't win it's bad coaching 100% of the time. When they win it's because of talented players and in spite of poor coaching. When they don't have good players it's cause the coach can't get any good athletes to play for him.
For those people you'll never convince them of anything different. There's a much smaller group too:
3. The coach wins when he has talent and loses when he doesn't.
This is all from what I've seen and heard anyway.