And if Hillsboro wins you delete your account....Put Unioto in the FAC and see if they do much better. Unioto won on two Hail Mary's this season pretty much to get 2 of their 3 wins against bad D5 schools. I'm not sure id call that game a lock vs Hillsboro...Hillsboro strength of schedule > Unioto strength of schedulefootball87 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 3:02 pmIf Unioto does not beat Hillsboro you gotta delete your account, that's the only option possible Im sorrymlittle wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 2:57 pmSheeeeeeit!! We gotta beat Hillsboro firstfootball87 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 2:45 pm I actually like Waverly's draw. 1st game against Schroder or Norwood should be a win (don't know much about either). If they advance, they get McNich which I think is the best draw in terms if 3rd round opponents. Will be able to know how good McNich really is, although they will have a bye week 2 weeks in a row by playing Unioto.
Region 16
Re: Region 16
Re: Region 16
We are young and our run defense has been bad. Hillsboro will be a tuff game for us. We will have a very nice team in a few years. Would like to see less hate for unioto but it has been a common theme since I’ve moved down here.
Re: Region 16
I think it will be a tough game for both teams! I'm not saying I think Unioto is bad. They have always had hard nosed kids that on any given night can beat you. My point is, don't sleep on Hillsboro because of their record. They have played one team so far with a losing record, that being WCH, the only D4 team they have played.
Correct me if Im wrong, but hasn't Unioto and Hillsboro scrimmaged every year?? Wasn't that pretty evenly matched every time?
Re: Region 16
Learn ya some football. Neither of those plays were Hail Marys. Both designed plays for a specific target executed to perfection with help from terrible defenses.veer wrote: ↑Fri Oct 02, 2020 7:17 amAnd if Hillsboro wins you delete your account....Put Unioto in the FAC and see if they do much better. Unioto won on two Hail Mary's this season pretty much to get 2 of their 3 wins against bad D5 schools. I'm not sure id call that game a lock vs Hillsboro...Hillsboro strength of schedule > Unioto strength of schedulefootball87 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 3:02 pmIf Unioto does not beat Hillsboro you gotta delete your account, that's the only option possible Im sorry
And I’m guessing Unioto is the only school who loses to teams in lower divisions around here the way it gets brought up so much.
Re: Region 16
mlittle wrote: ↑Fri Oct 02, 2020 7:43 amLearn ya some football. Neither of those plays were Hail Marys. Both designed plays for a specific target executed to perfection with help from terrible defenses.veer wrote: ↑Fri Oct 02, 2020 7:17 amAnd if Hillsboro wins you delete your account....Put Unioto in the FAC and see if they do much better. Unioto won on two Hail Mary's this season pretty much to get 2 of their 3 wins against bad D5 schools. I'm not sure id call that game a lock vs Hillsboro...Hillsboro strength of schedule > Unioto strength of schedulefootball87 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 3:02 pm
If Unioto does not beat Hillsboro you gotta delete your account, that's the only option possible Im sorry
And I’m guessing Unioto is the only school who loses to teams in lower divisions around here the way it gets brought up so much.
Re: Region 16
I believe unioto voted Waverly 3The Flush wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 1:53 pmWhere can you find the rest of the votes?formerfcfan wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 1:42 pm Waverly received a second place vote from Indian Hill and third-place votes from Wyoming and Clinton-Massie. McClain ranked Waverly seventh on their ballot.
-
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2016 2:10 pm
Re: Region 16
Yes, most voted Waverly in the 3-5 range. I think the Tigers were deserving of higher with the strength of schedule but believe the 4 is not a bad spot at all. Assured a bye and two homes games if they win the first. One cannot argue Indian Hill and Wyoming being 2 & 3.Rolltanks wrote: ↑Fri Oct 02, 2020 8:31 amI believe unioto voted Waverly 3The Flush wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 1:53 pmWhere can you find the rest of the votes?formerfcfan wrote: ↑Thu Oct 01, 2020 1:42 pm Waverly received a second place vote from Indian Hill and third-place votes from Wyoming and Clinton-Massie. McClain ranked Waverly seventh on their ballot.
Re: Region 16
I actually like your guys draw a lotsmurray wrote: ↑Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:16 amYes, most voted Waverly in the 3-5 range. I think the Tigers were deserving of higher with the strength of schedule but believe the 4 is not a bad spot at all. Assured a bye and two homes games if they win the first. One cannot argue Indian Hill and Wyoming being 2 & 3.
Re: Region 16
#4 in this region is a good spot to be. McNick will be a tough opponent but if you make it that far every week will be tough.smurray wrote: ↑Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:16 amYes, most voted Waverly in the 3-5 range. I think the Tigers were deserving of higher with the strength of schedule but believe the 4 is not a bad spot at all. Assured a bye and two homes games if they win the first. One cannot argue Indian Hill and Wyoming being 2 & 3.
Re: Region 16
Absolutelyveer wrote: ↑Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:31 am#4 in this region is a good spot to be. McNick will be a tough opponent but if you make it that far every week will be tough.smurray wrote: ↑Fri Oct 02, 2020 9:16 amYes, most voted Waverly in the 3-5 range. I think the Tigers were deserving of higher with the strength of schedule but believe the 4 is not a bad spot at all. Assured a bye and two homes games if they win the first. One cannot argue Indian Hill and Wyoming being 2 & 3.
Re: Region 16
Despite a couple team's questionable votes, nobody was really screwed in the final seeds. Other than the bottom seeds, it appears that everyone was within 2 places of where the computer points would have placed them.