Region 27
-
- All State
- Posts: 1056
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:24 am
Re: Region 27
Some interesting r27 week 6 scores
(2) East Knox 7
(4) Danville 6 (at EK)
(3) River 25
(7) Shadyside 27 (at river)
(6) Caldwell 34
(12) Conotton Valley 8 (at cv)
Region is wide open. Top 7 seeds have a realistic chance to win it.
(2) East Knox 7
(4) Danville 6 (at EK)
(3) River 25
(7) Shadyside 27 (at river)
(6) Caldwell 34
(12) Conotton Valley 8 (at cv)
Region is wide open. Top 7 seeds have a realistic chance to win it.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: Region 27
icanpickem wrote: ↑Fri Oct 02, 2020 11:00 pm Some interesting r27 week 6 scores
(2) East Knox 7
(4) Danville 6 (at EK)
(3) River 25
(7) Shadyside 27 (at river)
(6) Caldwell 34
(12) Conotton Valley 8 (at cv)
Region is wide open. Top 7 seeds have a realistic chance to win it.
Watch out for Reedsville Eastern
-
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 8:35 am
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 3712
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:41 pm
- Location: Amanda, OH
Re: Region 27
7-6 giveth, 7-6 taketh away. I’m impressed with what Coach Smith is doing in his first year up your way. He’s going to be a very good coach.icanpickem wrote: ↑Fri Oct 02, 2020 11:00 pm Some interesting r27 week 6 scores
(2) East Knox 7
(4) Danville 6 (at EK)
(3) River 25
(7) Shadyside 27 (at river)
(6) Caldwell 34
(12) Conotton Valley 8 (at cv)
Region is wide open. Top 7 seeds have a realistic chance to win it.
-
- All State
- Posts: 1056
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:24 am
Re: Region 27
True, true and trueformerfcfan wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 4:47 pm7-6 giveth, 7-6 taketh away. I’m impressed with what Coach Smith is doing in his first year up your way. He’s going to be a very good coach.icanpickem wrote: ↑Fri Oct 02, 2020 11:00 pm Some interesting r27 week 6 scores
(2) East Knox 7
(4) Danville 6 (at EK)
(3) River 25
(7) Shadyside 27 (at river)
(6) Caldwell 34
(12) Conotton Valley 8 (at cv)
Region is wide open. Top 7 seeds have a realistic chance to win it.
- BeastOfTheSoutheast
- JV Team
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2019 11:11 pm
Re: Region 27
Just like Waterford was going to beat Trimble? Just like Waterford was going to beat Eastern? Glad to see you back on here Muffler. Your picks keeps us entertained. Surprised they let you off suicide watch after weeks 4 and 5 beginning to think you’re just a troll.
Statistics Are Like Bikinis...They Show A Lot, But Not Everything.
Re: Region 27
You make think I’m a troll but I believe everything I sayBeastOfTheSoutheast wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:09 pmJust like Waterford was going to beat Trimble? Just like Waterford was going to beat Eastern? Glad to see you back on here Muffler. Your picks keeps us entertained. Surprised they let you off suicide watch after weeks 4 and 5 beginning to think you’re just a troll.
Re: Region 27
Ignorance is a scary thing lol. Waterford will lose to River by 3 TDsMuffler wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:17 pmYou make think I’m a troll but I believe everything I sayBeastOfTheSoutheast wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:09 pmJust like Waterford was going to beat Trimble? Just like Waterford was going to beat Eastern? Glad to see you back on here Muffler. Your picks keeps us entertained. Surprised they let you off suicide watch after weeks 4 and 5 beginning to think you’re just a troll.
Last edited by OvGuy on Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Region 27
Could be one of the more entertaining regions, but until someone can step up to Trimble I still think they have to be the favorites going into it. They have the easiest path to the semifinal game, these other teams mentioned are all going to end up taking each other out before taking on Trimble. Should have them better prepared though for a Trimble team. Danville might be the only team in the top half of the bracket that can give Trimble a game.
Re: Region 27
To me it’s the winner of Newark/Trimble and River/Shadyside for the regional final. Even though the path runs through Trimble this will forever be Newark’s region to lose year in and year out.
- BeastOfTheSoutheast
- JV Team
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2019 11:11 pm
Re: Region 27
As long as you believe it, that’s all that mattersMuffler wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:17 pmYou make think I’m a troll but I believe everything I sayBeastOfTheSoutheast wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 8:09 pmJust like Waterford was going to beat Trimble? Just like Waterford was going to beat Eastern? Glad to see you back on here Muffler. Your picks keeps us entertained. Surprised they let you off suicide watch after weeks 4 and 5 beginning to think you’re just a troll.
Statistics Are Like Bikinis...They Show A Lot, But Not Everything.
Re: Region 27
This is exactly why in my mind Newark was overrated in the seeding process, sorry but a team sitting at #12 in the region for points shouldn't have been allotted a #5 seed. They played close games with the Johnnies and Heath but those 2 teams combined to beat 1 opponent with a winning record. In my mind they were seeded based on their tradition not 2020 body of work, it happens with how things are setup this year. Not a knock on Newark as it wasn't their call to put them at #5 it's just the way coaches voted, but just going off points I don't know how you justify that type of jump.
-
- All State
- Posts: 1056
- Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:24 am
Re: Region 27
If NC had wins against racine southern, beallsville, Bridgeport and Cameron, WV would that justify their 5 seed?greygoose wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 9:00 pmThis is exactly why in my mind Newark was overrated in the seeding process, sorry but a team sitting at #12 in the region for points shouldn't have been allotted a #5 seed. They played close games with the Johnnies and Heath but those 2 teams combined to beat 1 opponent with a winning record. In my mind they were seeded based on their tradition not 2020 body of work, it happens with how things are setup this year. Not a knock on Newark as it wasn't their call to put them at #5 it's just the way coaches voted, but just going off points I don't know how you justify that type of jump.
They would be 5 in Harbin points when vote happened
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 3712
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:41 pm
- Location: Amanda, OH
Re: Region 27
2020 body of work? Please. They would’ve been #4 in the region had a coward coach not voted them #16.greygoose wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 9:00 pmThis is exactly why in my mind Newark was overrated in the seeding process, sorry but a team sitting at #12 in the region for points shouldn't have been allotted a #5 seed. They played close games with the Johnnies and Heath but those 2 teams combined to beat 1 opponent with a winning record. In my mind they were seeded based on their tradition not 2020 body of work, it happens with how things are setup this year. Not a knock on Newark as it wasn't their call to put them at #5 it's just the way coaches voted, but just going off points I don't know how you justify that type of jump.
As for the rest of your post: garbage.
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 3712
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:41 pm
- Location: Amanda, OH
Re: Region 27
I usually agree with greygoose but he’s completely wrong on this, LMAO.icanpickem wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 9:30 pmIf NC had wins against racine southern, beallsville, Bridgeport and Cameron, WV would that justify their 5 seed?greygoose wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 9:00 pmThis is exactly why in my mind Newark was overrated in the seeding process, sorry but a team sitting at #12 in the region for points shouldn't have been allotted a #5 seed. They played close games with the Johnnies and Heath but those 2 teams combined to beat 1 opponent with a winning record. In my mind they were seeded based on their tradition not 2020 body of work, it happens with how things are setup this year. Not a knock on Newark as it wasn't their call to put them at #5 it's just the way coaches voted, but just going off points I don't know how you justify that type of jump.
They would be 5 in Harbin points when vote happened
Re: Region 27
Not playing hypotheticals just stating the facts.icanpickem wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 9:30 pmIf NC had wins against racine southern, beallsville, Bridgeport and Cameron, WV would that justify their 5 seed?greygoose wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 9:00 pmThis is exactly why in my mind Newark was overrated in the seeding process, sorry but a team sitting at #12 in the region for points shouldn't have been allotted a #5 seed. They played close games with the Johnnies and Heath but those 2 teams combined to beat 1 opponent with a winning record. In my mind they were seeded based on their tradition not 2020 body of work, it happens with how things are setup this year. Not a knock on Newark as it wasn't their call to put them at #5 it's just the way coaches voted, but just going off points I don't know how you justify that type of jump.
They would be 5 in Harbin points when vote happened
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 3712
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:41 pm
- Location: Amanda, OH
Re: Region 27
What “facts?” Do you see wins against Notre Dame, Green, Southern, Beallsville, Bridgeport etc in a higher light than one-score losses to Heath and Johnstown? Good grief, man.greygoose wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 9:41 pmNot playing hypotheticals just stating the facts.icanpickem wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 9:30 pmIf NC had wins against racine southern, beallsville, Bridgeport and Cameron, WV would that justify their 5 seed?greygoose wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 9:00 pm
This is exactly why in my mind Newark was overrated in the seeding process, sorry but a team sitting at #12 in the region for points shouldn't have been allotted a #5 seed. They played close games with the Johnnies and Heath but those 2 teams combined to beat 1 opponent with a winning record. In my mind they were seeded based on their tradition not 2020 body of work, it happens with how things are setup this year. Not a knock on Newark as it wasn't their call to put them at #5 it's just the way coaches voted, but just going off points I don't know how you justify that type of jump.
They would be 5 in Harbin points when vote happened
Re: Region 27
That's ok to disagree with me, it's no big deal the facts are right there. They were a #12 point team without any significant win, even though Friday's game didn't count towards the seeding let's look at their body of work. They're a 3-3 team with wins against teams that have a combined record of 3-15, I get you're a Newark guy and I like I said no knock on them at all. Maybe they win the region or make a deep run, but the numbers simply don't justify the #5 seed. Sorry man.formerfcfan wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 9:41 pmI usually agree with greygoose but he’s completely wrong on this, LMAO.icanpickem wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 9:30 pmIf NC had wins against racine southern, beallsville, Bridgeport and Cameron, WV would that justify their 5 seed?greygoose wrote: ↑Sat Oct 03, 2020 9:00 pm
This is exactly why in my mind Newark was overrated in the seeding process, sorry but a team sitting at #12 in the region for points shouldn't have been allotted a #5 seed. They played close games with the Johnnies and Heath but those 2 teams combined to beat 1 opponent with a winning record. In my mind they were seeded based on their tradition not 2020 body of work, it happens with how things are setup this year. Not a knock on Newark as it wasn't their call to put them at #5 it's just the way coaches voted, but just going off points I don't know how you justify that type of jump.
They would be 5 in Harbin points when vote happened