bbjunky81 wrote: Thu Mar 04, 2021 10:58 pmThere is no difference.danicalifornia wrote: Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:47 pmI heard the stream was really good late in the season, I’m hoping that it is tomorrow when I’ll be watching.hbk1999 wrote: Thu Mar 04, 2021 8:40 pm Two hours later and the seops babies are still whining. Seems like some grown men would be on here. Guess not.
Boo Hoo.
I mean, it’s $10 for tickets to go to the games as it is, so what’s the difference for a great game? Especially when it sounded like it was well done.
How much does gas cost to drive to the Convo?
How much is admission into the Convo?
How much is a hotdog and pop at the Convo?
....... but let’s complain about paying $10 for a stream (which literally saves you money when you look at the big picture and do the basic math)
Let’s also keep in mind that those folks who didn’t want to drive to the Convo / pay money to get into the Convo could always listen to the game on the radio in the past..... GUESS WHAT!! You can still listen to the game on the radio completely free of charge.
It's not about the money. It's about the principle of the matter. Why isn't every school charging for the live stream that is hosting this weekend? As far as I've seen only Piketon is.
The convo comparison is not even close. How many games did you get to see with that $10? Wasn't it usually 4-5 for the semifinals and then two for the Finals. The Convo was an experience for everyone. The atmosphere was great and you got to watch some pretty good games ALL DAY!!!!!
You're not going to change my mind nor quite a few other people on here who think it is BS that they are charging. You have your opinion and I have mind!!!
