Huck started out with a great run of athletes. As those start to wane so will the competitiveness with Trimble. It started 4 years ago the the first of 4 wins in a row for Trimble. BTW Waterford was 5-5 last year and had 2 losses in the Hocking. The down hill slide continues.Buckeye2021 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:33 pmWhat I was getting at is this is the best coaching staff Waterford has had , take fares from Trimble and Huck from fort and I think the last 10 yrs would be differentPat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:22 pmCome on man! Wateford beat Trimble 3 times in 2 years with their best teams in history. Trimble has ripped off 4 in a row. It's back to normal in the Hocking with Trimble winning it and everyone else just happy to score on them.Buckeye2021 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:15 pm
Yes Trimble has had the better team last 4yrs this year was way closer than the score and last was14-0 Waterford is competing now . Waterford is on the right track and can trip up Trimble every few years IMO
2021 Trimble 13 - 45 Fort Frye
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
-
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2021 11:41 am
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
If you only want to go back the last 10 years I guess Trimble was down. Dig a little deeper and you would find Trimble would have loved an average year of 8-3 or 9-3. And as for Huck he absolutely took over a mess at the fort and made it what it was today smhPat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:56 pmHuck started out with a great run of athletes. As those start to wane so will the competitiveness with Trimble. It started 4 years ago the the first of 4 wins in a row for Trimble. BTW Waterford was 5-5 last year and had 2 losses in the Hocking. The down hill slide continues.Buckeye2021 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:33 pmWhat I was getting at is this is the best coaching staff Waterford has had , take fares from Trimble and Huck from fort and I think the last 10 yrs would be different
-
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2021 11:41 am
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
Pretty sure Trimble fans were honest 2018 ,2019 teams would be right up there with best teams at TrimblePat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:56 pmHuck started out with a great run of athletes. As those start to wane so will the competitiveness with Trimble. It started 4 years ago the the first of 4 wins in a row for Trimble. BTW Waterford was 5-5 last year and had 2 losses in the Hocking. The down hill slide continues.Buckeye2021 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:33 pmWhat I was getting at is this is the best coaching staff Waterford has had , take fares from Trimble and Huck from fort and I think the last 10 yrs would be different
-
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2021 12:08 pm
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
The 18 19 teams probably are the best. 18 state runner up, 19 got bumped to D6 and lost by 1 to the D6 state runner up on a long hook and lateral 4th down conversionBuckeye2021 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:03 pmPretty sure Trimble fans were honest 2018 ,2019 teams would be right up there with best teams at TrimblePat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:56 pmHuck started out with a great run of athletes. As those start to wane so will the competitiveness with Trimble. It started 4 years ago the the first of 4 wins in a row for Trimble. BTW Waterford was 5-5 last year and had 2 losses in the Hocking. The down hill slide continues.Buckeye2021 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:33 pm
What I was getting at is this is the best coaching staff Waterford has had , take fares from Trimble and Huck from fort and I think the last 10 yrs would be different
Greatest 12 in US Open History
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
I don't know anything about Huck, but I can tell you when Trimble loses to any TVC Hocking team it's a down year for them, and a great year for whatever Hocking team beats them. He11 it's a down year for them whenever a Hocking team scores on them in recent years. LOLBuckeye2021 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:01 pmIf you only want to go back the last 10 years I guess Trimble was down. Dig a little deeper and you would find Trimble would have loved an average year of 8-3 or 9-3. And as for Huck he absolutely took over a mess at the fort and made it what it was today smhPat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:56 pmHuck started out with a great run of athletes. As those start to wane so will the competitiveness with Trimble. It started 4 years ago the the first of 4 wins in a row for Trimble. BTW Waterford was 5-5 last year and had 2 losses in the Hocking. The down hill slide continues.Buckeye2021 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:33 pm
What I was getting at is this is the best coaching staff Waterford has had , take fares from Trimble and Huck from fort and I think the last 10 yrs would be different
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
May be, but this years team is not. An average at best, more likely below average, NY team held them to 7 points. Yet they beat Waterford soundly.Buckeye2021 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:03 pmPretty sure Trimble fans were honest 2018 ,2019 teams would be right up there with best teams at TrimblePat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:56 pmHuck started out with a great run of athletes. As those start to wane so will the competitiveness with Trimble. It started 4 years ago the the first of 4 wins in a row for Trimble. BTW Waterford was 5-5 last year and had 2 losses in the Hocking. The down hill slide continues.Buckeye2021 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:33 pm
What I was getting at is this is the best coaching staff Waterford has had , take fares from Trimble and Huck from fort and I think the last 10 yrs would be different
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
Just hope this isn’t a 1 and done series. Let’s play this game every year.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
I think
Fort Frye
Trimble
Warren
Nelsonville
Athens
Waterford
Marietta
Should all be in 1 league.
Fort Frye
Trimble
Warren
Nelsonville
Athens
Waterford
Marietta
Should all be in 1 league.
Last edited by EasternDspy on Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
NY is not going to join a league that includes Wateford, or any other Hocking team aside from Trimble. Actually, Trimble should be playing football in the TVC Ohio.EasternDspy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:36 pm I think
Fort Frye
Trimble
Warren
Nelsonville
Athens
Waterford
Should all be in 1 league.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
With 16 teams making it in the playoffs TVC should stop wasting its time with River Valley and add Fort Frye.Pat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:37 pmNY is not going to join a league that includes Wateford, or any other Hocking team aside from Trimble. Actually, Trimble should be playing football in the TVC Ohio.EasternDspy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:36 pm I think
Fort Frye
Trimble
Warren
Nelsonville
Athens
Waterford
Should all be in 1 league.
Only schools that didn’t want Fort Frye in were Wellston , VC , River Valley and South Gailia. Teams they just don’t want to get better. I’ll give VC credit they are improving. South Gallia left why not revote? Losing one game won’t kill you and beating a Fort Frye would give you a game with huge points on the line.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
Pat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:37 pmNY is not going to join a league that includes Wateford, or any other Hocking team aside from Trimble. Actually, Trimble should be playing football in the TVC Ohio.EasternDspy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:36 pm I think
Fort Frye
Trimble
Warren
Nelsonville
Athens
Waterford
Should all be in 1 league.
Why though? Waterford has been good over last 10 years and gives you solid points. Waterford better at most the other sports?
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
I agree. NY voted yes, and they voted yes for Warren to come in. In fact, they've voted yes on everyone who's recently asked to join the Ohio except RV. But you are correct, the teams that vote no are scared to try to improve or play anyone any good. Other than one season RV has been awful and will continue to be and it takes for ever to get there and the facility, though new, is more suited for the Hocking than the Ohio. Furthermore, RV and SG have the same superintendent, so when the supers vote they should only count as one, but they get to vote twice. Doesn't make sense if you ask me. Do the expect the person to vote yes and no on the same issue? Just stupid, but many things in the TVC make no sense, so...EasternDspy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:40 pmWith 16 teams making it in the playoffs TVC should stop wasting its time with River Valley and add Fort Frye.Pat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:37 pmNY is not going to join a league that includes Wateford, or any other Hocking team aside from Trimble. Actually, Trimble should be playing football in the TVC Ohio.EasternDspy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:36 pm I think
Fort Frye
Trimble
Warren
Nelsonville
Athens
Waterford
Should all be in 1 league.
Only schools that didn’t want Fort Frye in were Wellston , VC , River Valley and South Gailia. Teams they just don’t want to get better. I’ll give VC credit they are improving. South Gallia left why not revote? Losing one game won’t kill you and beating a Fort Frye would give you a game with huge points on the line.
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
Just not going to happen in football at least. Maybe in the other sports, but not football.EasternDspy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:42 pmPat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:37 pmNY is not going to join a league that includes Wateford, or any other Hocking team aside from Trimble. Actually, Trimble should be playing football in the TVC Ohio.EasternDspy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:36 pm I think
Fort Frye
Trimble
Warren
Nelsonville
Athens
Waterford
Should all be in 1 league.
Why though? Waterford has been good over last 10 years and gives you solid points. Waterford better at most the other sports?
-
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2021 11:41 am
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
Trimble would not want this either they have owned the hocking and OhioPat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:49 pmJust not going to happen in football at least. Maybe in the other sports, but not football.EasternDspy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:42 pm
Why though? Waterford has been good over last 10 years and gives you solid points. Waterford better at most the other sports?
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
Now that's funny right there. Trimble has never played in the Ohio and off the top of my head I can only remember them beating NY once in the last decade when NY won the Ohio. During that time Trimble hasn't played anyone else in the Ohio. It's a lot easier to get up for one game than it is to face the bigger schools week in and week out. So, to say Trimble has "owned the Ohio" is laughable.Buckeye2021 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:53 pmTrimble would not want this either they have owned the hocking and OhioPat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:49 pmJust not going to happen in football at least. Maybe in the other sports, but not football.EasternDspy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:42 pm
Why though? Waterford has been good over last 10 years and gives you solid points. Waterford better at most the other sports?
-
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2021 11:41 am
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
Ny 3-4 in last 7 Lost 4 in a row guess were on the slide togetherPat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:06 pmNow that's funny right there. Trimble has never played in the Ohio and off the top of my head I can only remember them beating NY once in the last decade when NY won the Ohio. During that time Trimble hasn't played anyone else in the Ohio. It's a lot easier to get up for one game than it is to face the bigger schools week in and week out. So, to say Trimble has "owned the Ohio" is laughable.Buckeye2021 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:53 pmTrimble would not want this either they have owned the hocking and Ohio
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
Trimble would have beaten the brakes off of VC. All I know is saying alls you have to do is stop the QB run is much easier than actually doing it. Ask anyone who's played us this year. If anyone does ever stop it they'll quickly find out about all the other weapons the Cats have. So good luck if that's your game plan. Just saying.Justy wrote: ↑Mon Sep 20, 2021 10:56 amYes VC was licking their chops to play Trimble because they knew if they could stop QB run left and QB run right they would shut them down. Too bad the game got cancelled. I wonder if the QB was one of the starters they had out.Ff3233 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 20, 2021 9:25 amThis is also funny because if he's hurt, then why is he still in game up 21 with under 3 min to go vs waterford?Raider6309 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 19, 2021 10:59 pm
Guffey. Hes played some but hasn't been used a lot. He's probably their best player. Got hurt during summer basketball
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
You can say that, though NY has a huge win to loss margin over Trimble while Wateford is the opposite. Order is quickly being restored and for the foreseeable future Wateford will be happy to even score on Trimble while Trimble will be happy to beat NY once every now and then.Buckeye2021 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:11 pmNy 3-4 in last 7 Lost 4 in a row guess were on the slide togetherPat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:06 pmNow that's funny right there. Trimble has never played in the Ohio and off the top of my head I can only remember them beating NY once in the last decade when NY won the Ohio. During that time Trimble hasn't played anyone else in the Ohio. It's a lot easier to get up for one game than it is to face the bigger schools week in and week out. So, to say Trimble has "owned the Ohio" is laughable.Buckeye2021 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:53 pm
Trimble would not want this either they have owned the hocking and Ohio
-
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2021 11:41 am
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
Pat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:14 pmYou can say that, though NY has a huge win to loss margin over Trimble while Wateford is the opposite. Order is quickly being restored and for the foreseeable future Wateford will be happy to even score on Trimble while Trimble will be happy to beat NY once every now and then.Buckeye2021 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:11 pmI guess I didn’t realize the juggernaut that ny was when they ghosted fort in azz beating in the grassPat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:06 pm
Now that's funny right there. Trimble has never played in the Ohio and off the top of my head I can only remember them beating NY once in the last decade when NY won the Ohio. During that time Trimble hasn't played anyone else in the Ohio. It's a lot easier to get up for one game than it is to face the bigger schools week in and week out. So, to say Trimble has "owned the Ohio" is laughable.
Ny 3-4 in last 7 Lost 4 in a row guess were on the slide together
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
Yea, we ducked FF and picked up lowly Newark Catholic Meanwhile, didn't I read where Fort had a chance to play Ridgewood but wouldn't return the call? Answer the phone.Buckeye2021 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:19 pmPat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:14 pmYou can say that, though NY has a huge win to loss margin over Trimble while Wateford is the opposite. Order is quickly being restored and for the foreseeable future Wateford will be happy to even score on Trimble while Trimble will be happy to beat NY once every now and then.Buckeye2021 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:11 pm
I guess I didn’t realize the juggernaut that ny was when they ghosted fort in azz beating in the grass
Ny 3-4 in last 7 Lost 4 in a row guess were on the slide together