Pat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:25 pmYea, we ducked FF and picked up lowly Newark Catholic Meanwhile, didn't I read where Fort had a chance to play Ridgewood but wouldn't return the call? Answer the phone.Buckeye2021 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:19 pmPat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:14 pm
You can say that, though NY has a huge win to loss margin over Trimble while Wateford is the opposite. Order is quickly being restored and for the foreseeable future Wateford will be happy to even score on Trimble while Trimble will be happy to beat NY once every now and then.
2021 Trimble 13 - 45 Fort Frye
-
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2021 11:41 am
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
-
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2021 11:41 am
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
. Couldn’t say I have no idea , we have hijacked this thread long enough. Good luck to ny. Hoping for a good game by fort and TrimbleBuckeye2021 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:30 pm
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
I’m guessing you haven’t seen Fort Frye DL.Tow Head wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:12 pmTrimble would have beaten the brakes off of VC. All I know is saying alls you have to do is stop the QB run is much easier than actually doing it. Ask anyone who's played us this year. If anyone does ever stop it they'll quickly find out about all the other weapons the Cats have. So good luck if that's your game plan. Just saying.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
Pat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:25 pmYea, we ducked FF and picked up lowly Newark Catholic Meanwhile, didn't I read where Fort had a chance to play Ridgewood but wouldn't return the call? Answer the phone.Buckeye2021 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:19 pmPat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:14 pm
You can say that, though NY has a huge win to loss margin over Trimble while Wateford is the opposite. Order is quickly being restored and for the foreseeable future Wateford will be happy to even score on Trimble while Trimble will be happy to beat NY once every now and then.
Already had a game with St Henry out of the Mac. Tell Ridgewood to call back.
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
That's a league Waterford has no interest in joining.EasternDspy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 2:36 pm I think
Fort Frye
Trimble
Warren
Nelsonville
Athens
Waterford
Marietta
Should all be in 1 league.
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
Thought you're a VC fan? Scheduling a MAC school and LCC is definitely better than any hocking ohio team has on their plate. We declined Ridgewood because we already had previous 2 teams, plus trimble, zanesville and a probably not very good logan team. Trolling about Ridgewood with our schedule this year is rather comical while looking at who VC has.Justy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 12:17 pmThey didn't have all their starters, so they didn't want to chance it. It's easy to do that this year with the Covid excuse readily available. BTW why didn't FF sign on to play Ridgewood? Scared? I guess they have good reason to be so it was better to play a few teams from the other side of the state LOL.Ff3233 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 11:18 amWhy would you think anyone would be ducking VC? They haven't beaten anyone. Waterford beat crooksville worse than VC and we all saw how trimble did vs waterford. VC doesn't scare anyone, particularly trimbleJusty wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 10:30 am
I had 15 posters PM me ripping me for saying Trimble ducked VC and claiming they are from Trimble. I can see someone posting something on the open forum being an imposter trying to stir the pot. But doubtful they would go so far as to PM someone. I think the real reason they are quiet is because they got a reality check last week and they have to know FF is better than JM. Probably a little gun shy after pounding their chests and getting it handed to them.
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
If you can ground and pound with Fort Frye and win, then you'll definitely earn the "w."Tow Head wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:12 pmTrimble would have beaten the brakes off of VC. All I know is saying alls you have to do is stop the QB run is much easier than actually doing it. Ask anyone who's played us this year. If anyone does ever stop it they'll quickly find out about all the other weapons the Cats have. So good luck if that's your game plan. Just saying.
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
How long has Huck been at Fort Frye? How many of those "great athletes" went on to play college ball at any level?Pat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:56 pmHuck started out with a great run of athletes. As those start to wane so will the competitiveness with Trimble. It started 4 years ago the the first of 4 wins in a row for Trimble. BTW Waterford was 5-5 last year and had 2 losses in the Hocking. The down hill slide continues.Buckeye2021 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:33 pmWhat I was getting at is this is the best coaching staff Waterford has had , take fares from Trimble and Huck from fort and I think the last 10 yrs would be different
I have no idea why you're talking.
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
I think pat misspoke and said huck instead of McCutcheonefarns wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 7:00 pmHow long has Huck been at Fort Frye? How many of those "great athletes" went on to play college ball at any level?Pat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:56 pmHuck started out with a great run of athletes. As those start to wane so will the competitiveness with Trimble. It started 4 years ago the the first of 4 wins in a row for Trimble. BTW Waterford was 5-5 last year and had 2 losses in the Hocking. The down hill slide continues.Buckeye2021 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:33 pm
What I was getting at is this is the best coaching staff Waterford has had , take fares from Trimble and Huck from fort and I think the last 10 yrs would be different
I have no idea why you're talking.
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
Cant wait 4 this one. Somehow still after so much success people count out the Cadets still
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
Hmmmm . . . Yeah, that fits the rest of his post better. I think you're right.Ff3233 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 7:29 pmI think pat misspoke and said huck instead of McCutcheonefarns wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 7:00 pmHow long has Huck been at Fort Frye? How many of those "great athletes" went on to play college ball at any level?Pat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:56 pm
Huck started out with a great run of athletes. As those start to wane so will the competitiveness with Trimble. It started 4 years ago the the first of 4 wins in a row for Trimble. BTW Waterford was 5-5 last year and had 2 losses in the Hocking. The down hill slide continues.
I have no idea why you're talking.
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
Possible Covid outbreak at Trimble??? Hate to see this if true
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
Yes, St Henry who has 3 wins against two 1-4 teams and one 0-5 team. It ain't the St. Henry of old. Seems silly to play a team 4 hours away when you could have played a team an hour and 15 minutes away. And from what I've read on here you been dodging them for 2 years. No big deal to me except when you accuse everyone in this area of dodging you but you won't play someone an hour up the road. Then I have to call you out on it.EasternDspy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 4:06 pm
Already had a game with St Henry out of the Mac. Tell Ridgewood to call back.
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
Yes, my mistake. No offense meant to Huck.Ff3233 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 7:29 pmI think pat misspoke and said huck instead of McCutcheonefarns wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 7:00 pmHow long has Huck been at Fort Frye? How many of those "great athletes" went on to play college ball at any level?Pat wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 1:56 pm
Huck started out with a great run of athletes. As those start to wane so will the competitiveness with Trimble. It started 4 years ago the the first of 4 wins in a row for Trimble. BTW Waterford was 5-5 last year and had 2 losses in the Hocking. The down hill slide continues.
I have no idea why you're talking.
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
Too bad Trimble used the covid excuse to pull out or we would have found out. Guess will have to wait until next year, unless ya'll pull out again.Tow Head wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 3:12 pmTrimble would have beaten the brakes off of VC. All I know is saying alls you have to do is stop the QB run is much easier than actually doing it. Ask anyone who's played us this year. If anyone does ever stop it they'll quickly find out about all the other weapons the Cats have. So good luck if that's your game plan. Just saying.
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
They been after you for a few years now to play.Ff3233 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 6:30 pmThought you're a VC fan? Scheduling a MAC school and LCC is definitely better than any hocking ohio team has on their plate. We declined Ridgewood because we already had previous 2 teams, plus trimble, zanesville and a probably not very good logan team. Trolling about Ridgewood with our schedule this year is rather comical while looking at who VC has.Justy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 12:17 pmThey didn't have all their starters, so they didn't want to chance it. It's easy to do that this year with the Covid excuse readily available. BTW why didn't FF sign on to play Ridgewood? Scared? I guess they have good reason to be so it was better to play a few teams from the other side of the state LOL.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
Justy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 22, 2021 9:02 amThey been after you for a few years now to play.Ff3233 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 6:30 pmThought you're a VC fan? Scheduling a MAC school and LCC is definitely better than any hocking ohio team has on their plate. We declined Ridgewood because we already had previous 2 teams, plus trimble, zanesville and a probably not very good logan team. Trolling about Ridgewood with our schedule this year is rather comical while looking at who VC has.Justy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 12:17 pm
They didn't have all their starters, so they didn't want to chance it. It's easy to do that this year with the Covid excuse readily available. BTW why didn't FF sign on to play Ridgewood? Scared? I guess they have good reason to be so it was better to play a few teams from the other side of the state LOL.
They can only play week 2 and we had other games until this year. We really dogging Fort Frye schedule? They have had the most Harbin points multiple years in a row.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
Justy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 22, 2021 9:02 amThey been after you for a few years now to play.Ff3233 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 6:30 pmThought you're a VC fan? Scheduling a MAC school and LCC is definitely better than any hocking ohio team has on their plate. We declined Ridgewood because we already had previous 2 teams, plus trimble, zanesville and a probably not very good logan team. Trolling about Ridgewood with our schedule this year is rather comical while looking at who VC has.Justy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 12:17 pm
They didn't have all their starters, so they didn't want to chance it. It's easy to do that this year with the Covid excuse readily available. BTW why didn't FF sign on to play Ridgewood? Scared? I guess they have good reason to be so it was better to play a few teams from the other side of the state LOL.
Like I said tell them to call back. St Henry just dropped Fort Frye after 1 year.
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
Look, I don't really care, but thanks for pointing out some of the issues with scheduling games. Now apply those and other things as possibilities as to why other teams aren't playing you and stop making blanket statements that everyone is dodging you, if you want to be fair about it.EasternDspy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 22, 2021 9:09 amJusty wrote: ↑Wed Sep 22, 2021 9:02 amThey been after you for a few years now to play.Ff3233 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 6:30 pm
Thought you're a VC fan? Scheduling a MAC school and LCC is definitely better than any hocking ohio team has on their plate. We declined Ridgewood because we already had previous 2 teams, plus trimble, zanesville and a probably not very good logan team. Trolling about Ridgewood with our schedule this year is rather comical while looking at who VC has.
They can only play week 2 and we had other games until this year. We really dogging Fort Frye schedule? They have had the most Harbin points multiple years in a row.
Re: WK 6: Fort Frye (5-0) @ Trimble (3-1)
That’s because Fort is just on another levelEasternDspy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 22, 2021 9:12 amJusty wrote: ↑Wed Sep 22, 2021 9:02 amThey been after you for a few years now to play.Ff3233 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 21, 2021 6:30 pm
Thought you're a VC fan? Scheduling a MAC school and LCC is definitely better than any hocking ohio team has on their plate. We declined Ridgewood because we already had previous 2 teams, plus trimble, zanesville and a probably not very good logan team. Trolling about Ridgewood with our schedule this year is rather comical while looking at who VC has.
Like I said tell them to call back. St Henry just dropped Fort Frye after 1 year.
Stop making excuses and start making things happen!