Logan 17 - 14 Warren 2022
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18868
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18868
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: Wk 4: Warren (1-2) @ Logan (0-3)
I’m going with Logan by 14 plus. Least Warren gets to see Wing T 2 weeks in a row.
Re: Wk 4: Warren (1-2) @ Logan (0-3)
Logan defense will hurt Warren but not enough take the win.
Logan's offense is way behind Warren's.
Warren's defense is closer to Logan's than Logan's offense to Warrens. 20/13 Warren
Logan's offense is way behind Warren's.
Warren's defense is closer to Logan's than Logan's offense to Warrens. 20/13 Warren
GO LOGAN..The anti-Christ is among us
-
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2022 10:55 am
Re: Wk 4: Warren (1-2) @ Logan (0-3)
Warren needs to shake off last week's debacle against Williamstown. Won't be easy.
Re: Wk 4: Warren (1-2) @ Logan (0-3)
Williamstown was a case study in how a lack of a senior class kills a young team. The ball started rolling downhill and there were no older kids to steady the ship. We’re better than what showed. As far as this game, I’d say it’s one score either way.
-
- JV Team
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2020 10:15 am
Re: WK4 Warren (1-2) @ Logan (0-3)
Logan struggles to score points. I’ll take Warren by a TD coming by off two losses to undefeated teams.
- Raider6309
- SEOPS HOF
- Posts: 12987
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 2:00 pm
- Location: Athens
Re: WK4 Warren (1-2) @ Logan (0-3)
Homecoming at the Reservation this week. Expect a big crowd. Logan D needs to finish. Chiefs were outscored 21-0 in the second half last week after starting off the third period with several mistakes. Logan was 7-7 at the break but just dismal in the opening drive of the second half and never recovered.
Injuries are the big question mark this week. Saw good things in person last week from Swope, Fick, Brown, Walsh, Castle (2 INTs) Brooks. All will need to play well on Defense. One big mismatch last week we saw was Brooks on Sheridan's WR who lined up at TE. Just too much speed for a LB/OL to cover imo. Could of been a mistake but seemed odd he was covering a wideout near the goalline. Anxious to see how the D plays this week.
Logan 21 Warren 14
Injuries are the big question mark this week. Saw good things in person last week from Swope, Fick, Brown, Walsh, Castle (2 INTs) Brooks. All will need to play well on Defense. One big mismatch last week we saw was Brooks on Sheridan's WR who lined up at TE. Just too much speed for a LB/OL to cover imo. Could of been a mistake but seemed odd he was covering a wideout near the goalline. Anxious to see how the D plays this week.
Logan 21 Warren 14
Live Like A Champion!
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18868
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK4 Warren (1-2) @ Logan (0-3)
Logan has played better competition and played them tougher than I thought.
- 1987chieftains
- SEOPS H
- Posts: 7631
- Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 9:25 pm
- Location: IN A VAN DOWN BY THE RIVER
Re: WK4 Warren (1-2) @ Logan (0-3)
Though Logan has looked better this year. Until they put together improvements with a string of wins. Its still the same old, VERY same old.
Warren by 14pts
Warren by 14pts
AT THE RESERVATION
Re: WK4 Warren (1-2) @ Logan (0-3)
Once upon a time, members of the Logan Chieftain football team would consider Warren week, "Bye week".
-
- Varsity
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2015 9:35 am
Re: WK4 Warren (1-2) @ Logan (0-3)
Good chance the Chiefs get their 1st win by a close score . Go Chiefs!!!!
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 4741
- Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2017 9:38 am
Re: WK4 Warren (1-2) @ Logan (0-3)
logan sneeks out an SEOAL game.......
2019 FAC Football Pick’Em Champion
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18868
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: WK4 Warren (1-2) @ Logan (0-3)
Williamstown just ran for 418 yards on Warren. Warren is just not good in the trenches.1987chieftains wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 10:09 pm Though Logan has looked better this year. Until they put together improvements with a string of wins. Its still the same old, VERY same old.
Warren by 14pts
Re: WK4 Warren (1-2) @ Logan (0-3)
Especially defensively. Easily the worst unit on our team. Offensive line is not blowing anyone away, but they’re much more serviceable.EasternDspy wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 3:17 pmWilliamstown just ran for 418 yards on Warren. Warren is just not good in the trenches.1987chieftains wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 10:09 pm Though Logan has looked better this year. Until they put together improvements with a string of wins. Its still the same old, VERY same old.
Warren by 14pts
-
- Riding the Bench
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2022 1:31 pm
-
- JV Team
- Posts: 257
- Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2020 10:15 am
Re: WK4 Warren (1-2) @ Logan (0-3)
I’m just sayin. Williamstown would run for 400 yards against anyone around here and they includes Fort Frye. They have 3 studs in their backfield.EasternDspy wrote: ↑Thu Sep 08, 2022 3:17 pmWilliamstown just ran for 418 yards on Warren. Warren is just not good in the trenches.1987chieftains wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 10:09 pm Though Logan has looked better this year. Until they put together improvements with a string of wins. Its still the same old, VERY same old.
Warren by 14pts