Lol, he was good
Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)
Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)
"you miss 100% of the shots you don't take. Wayne Gretzky"
Michael Scott
Michael Scott
-
- Riding the Bench
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2022 1:38 pm
Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)
Jackson out smarted themselves on the 2pt try. Sweeps we're working for most of the night and we thought we could catch em out
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)
Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)
For sure, great game and season Jackson
"you miss 100% of the shots you don't take. Wayne Gretzky"
Michael Scott
Michael Scott
Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)
Man I'll tell you what once again Jackson falls well short in the playoffs, and if this team couldn't do it one has to wonder if they'll be able to break through. Heck of a game and nice fighting back into this one, congrats to the seniors on a great season and great careers. Hate to place blame but I really think the Jackson coaches are going to look back at this game offensively and realize they didn't help the cause tonight.
Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)
Division III football is a different animal !!!!greygoose wrote: ↑Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:22 pm Man I'll tell you what once again Jackson falls well short in the playoffs, and if this team couldn't do it one has to wonder if they'll be able to break through. Heck of a game and nice fighting back into this one, congrats to the seniors on a great season and great careers. Hate to place blame but I really think the Jackson coaches are going to look back at this game offensively and realize they didn't help the cause tonight.
-
- Waterboy
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2022 5:46 pm
Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)
Jackson gets recruits year after year and has the best support system for any program in south east Ohio and yet can’t win a region. Something has to give there. All the talent over the years and always falls short. Has to be disappointing for the fan base.
Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)
Pretty sure he a recent JHS grad that went through school on an IEP
Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)
Great battle, great fight. Big game. Proud of all the kids. Kids stepped up and made some big plays.
Good luck to Bishop Watterson….excellent team
Good luck to Bishop Watterson….excellent team
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)
If you read I said he was entertaining
Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)
Yeah they're in a tough region but they're not even getting to where they're playing for the region with these teams that also can't be used as an excuse either. For me and especially with the play calling as a whole tonight the coaches squandered a golden opportunity with this team.Ironmen44 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:27 pmDivision III football is a different animal !!!!greygoose wrote: ↑Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:22 pm Man I'll tell you what once again Jackson falls well short in the playoffs, and if this team couldn't do it one has to wonder if they'll be able to break through. Heck of a game and nice fighting back into this one, congrats to the seniors on a great season and great careers. Hate to place blame but I really think the Jackson coaches are going to look back at this game offensively and realize they didn't help the cause tonight.
Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)
Congrats Ironmen on an outstanding season and playoff run.
Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)
If you want to win DIII regionals then you need to play good DII and DIII teams and not DV teams. You don’t see the size of players playing DV schools.greygoose wrote: ↑Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:55 pmYeah they're in a tough region but they're not even getting to where they're playing for the region with these teams that also can't be used as an excuse either. For me and especially with the play calling as a whole tonight the coaches squandered a golden opportunity with this team.Ironmen44 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:27 pmDivision III football is a different animal !!!!greygoose wrote: ↑Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:22 pm Man I'll tell you what once again Jackson falls well short in the playoffs, and if this team couldn't do it one has to wonder if they'll be able to break through. Heck of a game and nice fighting back into this one, congrats to the seniors on a great season and great careers. Hate to place blame but I really think the Jackson coaches are going to look back at this game offensively and realize they didn't help the cause tonight.
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 3704
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:41 pm
- Location: Amanda, OH
Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)
Kudos to the guy for doing it, no matter ‘hwat. Takes stones to do play-by-play.
Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)
Are you a true Ironman poster?? There's no way because you don't even know who they play, all but 3 games were against DII and DIII schools The talent they have just isn't being taken to the next level and I'm sorry but that's on coaching, lining up foot to foot only gets you so far in the bigger divisions.Ironmen44 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 11, 2022 10:02 pmIf you want to win DIII regionals then you need to play good DII and DIII teams and not DV teams. You don’t see the size of players playing DV schools.greygoose wrote: ↑Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:55 pmYeah they're in a tough region but they're not even getting to where they're playing for the region with these teams that also can't be used as an excuse either. For me and especially with the play calling as a whole tonight the coaches squandered a golden opportunity with this team.
Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)
Great season Jackson, not bad for hard nosed southern Ohio boys !
Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)
Haha I know exactly who we played. Logan is the only DII team. The DIII teams we played are not the top teams in the state. Never mind dude you know it all……greygoose wrote: ↑Fri Nov 11, 2022 10:07 pmAre you a true Ironman poster?? There's no way because you don't even know who they play, all but 3 games were against DII and DIII schools The talent they have just isn't being taken to the next level and I'm sorry but that's on coaching, lining up foot to foot only gets you so far in the bigger divisions.Ironmen44 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 11, 2022 10:02 pmIf you want to win DIII regionals then you need to play good DII and DIII teams and not DV teams. You don’t see the size of players playing DV schools.greygoose wrote: ↑Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:55 pm
Yeah they're in a tough region but they're not even getting to where they're playing for the region with these teams that also can't be used as an excuse either. For me and especially with the play calling as a whole tonight the coaches squandered a golden opportunity with this team.
Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)
That's sort of the typical response when one realizes they stepped in it. Played 2-DV schools and lost to one of them the size of the player isn't the problem. I mean Jackson's non-conference schedule featured 5 teams and 4 of which were still playing tonight to advance to regional championship game. At that point you're putting it on league play and everyone all year long has talked up how great the FAC was this season even though only 1 team got past round 1. Just not sure what you're expecting.Ironmen44 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 11, 2022 10:17 pmHaha I know exactly who we played. Logan is the only DII team. The DIII teams we played are not the top teams in the state. Never mind dude you know it all……greygoose wrote: ↑Fri Nov 11, 2022 10:07 pmAre you a true Ironman poster?? There's no way because you don't even know who they play, all but 3 games were against DII and DIII schools The talent they have just isn't being taken to the next level and I'm sorry but that's on coaching, lining up foot to foot only gets you so far in the bigger divisions.
Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)
Congrats to Jackson on another great season. Tough way to end it, but they played well against a very good team.
Good luck to the seniors as they move on. Over the last four years, this class was 36-9 at the varsity level, won 3 outright FAC titles, went to the playoffs 4 times, and was 5-4 in playoff games. Yes, it would have been nice to take the next step and win a regional title, but that's still a nice list of accomplishments and something for those guys to be proud of and remember forever.
Good luck to the seniors as they move on. Over the last four years, this class was 36-9 at the varsity level, won 3 outright FAC titles, went to the playoffs 4 times, and was 5-4 in playoff games. Yes, it would have been nice to take the next step and win a regional title, but that's still a nice list of accomplishments and something for those guys to be proud of and remember forever.
Re: Round 3- #3. Bishop Watterson (11-1) Vs # 2. Jackson (10-2)
I thought the Hank Hill comment maybe not the best but maybe I read it the wrong wayEasternDspy wrote: ↑Fri Nov 11, 2022 9:51 pmIf you read I said he was entertaining