Was that when they started their TVC schedule? Funny how that happensNotFunnyAtAll wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 12:25 pmWhy are we worried about the past years. The almost unstoppable offense has been on a roll sense week 4. Waterford has found there identity and they will continue to be almost unstoppable.EasternDspy wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 10:40 pm Battle for the River
08- FORT FRYE 14 Waterford 0
09- FORT FRYE 35 Waterford 6
10- FORT FRYE 27 Waterford 0
11- FORT FRYE 34 Waterford 0
12- FORT FRYE 63 Waterford 13
13- FORT FRYE 47 Waterford 0
14- FORT FRYE 36 Waterford 6
15- FORT FRYE 27 Waterford 0
16- FORT FRYE 35 Waterford 14
17- FORT FRYE 23 Waterford 19
18- FORT FRYE 22 Waterford 20
19- FORT FRYE 49 Waterford 0
20- FORT FRYE 22 Waterford 6
21- FORT FRYE 39 Waterford 14
22- FORT FRYE 49 Waterford 19
23- FORT FRYE 16 Waterford 0
24- FORT FRYE 35 Waterford 7
Fort Frye 17-0
Points Scored 573 33.7
Points allowed 124 7.2
Playoff win trumps all this.
D6 23: 5. Waterford (9-2) @ 4. Fort Frye (8-3)
Re: D6 23: 5. Waterford (9-2) @ 4. Fort Frye (8-3)
-
- Riding the Bench
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2021 11:54 am
Re: D6 23: 5. Waterford (9-2) @ 4. Fort Frye (8-3)
Yeah teams that FF played too. Belpre and Harrison central. But FF didn’t want to play teams like Nelsonville York and Trimble.efarns wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 1:12 pmWas that when they started their TVC schedule? Funny how that happensNotFunnyAtAll wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 12:25 pmWhy are we worried about the past years. The almost unstoppable offense has been on a roll sense week 4. Waterford has found there identity and they will continue to be almost unstoppable.EasternDspy wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 10:40 pm Battle for the River
08- FORT FRYE 14 Waterford 0
09- FORT FRYE 35 Waterford 6
10- FORT FRYE 27 Waterford 0
11- FORT FRYE 34 Waterford 0
12- FORT FRYE 63 Waterford 13
13- FORT FRYE 47 Waterford 0
14- FORT FRYE 36 Waterford 6
15- FORT FRYE 27 Waterford 0
16- FORT FRYE 35 Waterford 14
17- FORT FRYE 23 Waterford 19
18- FORT FRYE 22 Waterford 20
19- FORT FRYE 49 Waterford 0
20- FORT FRYE 22 Waterford 6
21- FORT FRYE 39 Waterford 14
22- FORT FRYE 49 Waterford 19
23- FORT FRYE 16 Waterford 0
24- FORT FRYE 35 Waterford 7
Fort Frye 17-0
Points Scored 573 33.7
Points allowed 124 7.2
Playoff win trumps all this.
Re: D6 23: 5. Waterford (9-2) @ 4. Fort Frye (8-3)
Great! Now show the numbers of boys in each school and let’s compare! I’m sure you’ll be happy to see me back ole bubEasternDspy wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 10:40 pm Battle for the River
08- FORT FRYE 14 Waterford 0
09- FORT FRYE 35 Waterford 6
10- FORT FRYE 27 Waterford 0
11- FORT FRYE 34 Waterford 0
12- FORT FRYE 63 Waterford 13
13- FORT FRYE 47 Waterford 0
14- FORT FRYE 36 Waterford 6
15- FORT FRYE 27 Waterford 0
16- FORT FRYE 35 Waterford 14
17- FORT FRYE 23 Waterford 19
18- FORT FRYE 22 Waterford 20
19- FORT FRYE 49 Waterford 0
20- FORT FRYE 22 Waterford 6
21- FORT FRYE 39 Waterford 14
22- FORT FRYE 49 Waterford 19
23- FORT FRYE 16 Waterford 0
24- FORT FRYE 35 Waterford 7
Fort Frye 17-0
Points Scored 573 33.7
Points allowed 124 7.2
Playoff win trumps all this.
Re: D6 23: 5. Waterford (9-2) @ 4. Fort Frye (8-3)
****eye roll***NotFunnyAtAll wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 1:25 pmYeah teams that FF played too. Belpre and Harrison central. But FF didn’t want to play teams like Nelsonville York and Trimble.efarns wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 1:12 pmWas that when they started their TVC schedule? Funny how that happensNotFunnyAtAll wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 12:25 pm
Why are we worried about the past years. The almost unstoppable offense has been on a roll sense week 4. Waterford has found there identity and they will continue to be almost unstoppable.
Nelsonville famously ended the series with Fort Frye because, according to one of their fans, they "didn't want to play on grass" - after two bad losses. Fort Frye played Trimble once, and it was a Fort Frye blowout. Waterford plays a division 7 schedule, hasn't beaten The Cadets in over a decade. If Waterford didn't happen to be in the same community, would the series even be competitive enough to continue?
Re: D6 23: 5. Waterford (9-2) @ 4. Fort Frye (8-3)
Well . . . exactly. Why is Waterford so obsessed with competing with Fort Frye? That little brother jealousy is the only thing keeping this "rivalry" going.Muffler wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 1:39 pmGreat! Now show the numbers of boys in each school and let’s compare! I’m sure you’ll be happy to see me back ole bubEasternDspy wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 10:40 pm Battle for the River
08- FORT FRYE 14 Waterford 0
09- FORT FRYE 35 Waterford 6
10- FORT FRYE 27 Waterford 0
11- FORT FRYE 34 Waterford 0
12- FORT FRYE 63 Waterford 13
13- FORT FRYE 47 Waterford 0
14- FORT FRYE 36 Waterford 6
15- FORT FRYE 27 Waterford 0
16- FORT FRYE 35 Waterford 14
17- FORT FRYE 23 Waterford 19
18- FORT FRYE 22 Waterford 20
19- FORT FRYE 49 Waterford 0
20- FORT FRYE 22 Waterford 6
21- FORT FRYE 39 Waterford 14
22- FORT FRYE 49 Waterford 19
23- FORT FRYE 16 Waterford 0
24- FORT FRYE 35 Waterford 7
Fort Frye 17-0
Points Scored 573 33.7
Points allowed 124 7.2
Playoff win trumps all this.
Re: D6 23: 5. Waterford (9-2) @ 4. Fort Frye (8-3)
Or the fact the schools are 2 minutes apart is why it will forever be a rivalry.efarns wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 2:17 pmWell . . . exactly. Why is Waterford so obsessed with competing with Fort Frye? That little brother jealousy is the only thing keeping this "rivalry" going.Muffler wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 1:39 pmGreat! Now show the numbers of boys in each school and let’s compare! I’m sure you’ll be happy to see me back ole bubEasternDspy wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 10:40 pm Battle for the River
08- FORT FRYE 14 Waterford 0
09- FORT FRYE 35 Waterford 6
10- FORT FRYE 27 Waterford 0
11- FORT FRYE 34 Waterford 0
12- FORT FRYE 63 Waterford 13
13- FORT FRYE 47 Waterford 0
14- FORT FRYE 36 Waterford 6
15- FORT FRYE 27 Waterford 0
16- FORT FRYE 35 Waterford 14
17- FORT FRYE 23 Waterford 19
18- FORT FRYE 22 Waterford 20
19- FORT FRYE 49 Waterford 0
20- FORT FRYE 22 Waterford 6
21- FORT FRYE 39 Waterford 14
22- FORT FRYE 49 Waterford 19
23- FORT FRYE 16 Waterford 0
24- FORT FRYE 35 Waterford 7
Fort Frye 17-0
Points Scored 573 33.7
Points allowed 124 7.2
Playoff win trumps all this.
-
- Riding the Bench
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2021 11:54 am
Re: D6 23: 5. Waterford (9-2) @ 4. Fort Frye (8-3)
Very funny. FF didn’t want to play Trimble when they were the powerhouse they were. They got Trimble on the worst season they had in a decade. But you guys and your big heads got a different team coming Friday so all boys better be ready.efarns wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 2:16 pm****eye roll***NotFunnyAtAll wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 1:25 pmYeah teams that FF played too. Belpre and Harrison central. But FF didn’t want to play teams like Nelsonville York and Trimble.
Nelsonville famously ended the series with Fort Frye because, according to one of their fans, they "didn't want to play on grass" - after two bad losses. Fort Frye played Trimble once, and it was a Fort Frye blowout. Waterford plays a division 7 schedule, hasn't beaten The Cadets in over a decade. If Waterford didn't happen to be in the same community, would the series even be competitive enough to continue?
Re: D6 23: 5. Waterford (9-2) @ 4. Fort Frye (8-3)
Okay? Maybe. So you'd be 1-17 against Fort Frye in recent history.NotFunnyAtAll wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 2:29 pmVery funny. FF didn’t want to play Trimble when they were the powerhouse they were. They got Trimble on the worst season they had in a decade. But you guys and your big heads got a different team coming Friday so all boys better be ready.efarns wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 2:16 pm****eye roll***NotFunnyAtAll wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 1:25 pm
Yeah teams that FF played too. Belpre and Harrison central. But FF didn’t want to play teams like Nelsonville York and Trimble.
Nelsonville famously ended the series with Fort Frye because, according to one of their fans, they "didn't want to play on grass" - after two bad losses. Fort Frye played Trimble once, and it was a Fort Frye blowout. Waterford plays a division 7 schedule, hasn't beaten The Cadets in over a decade. If Waterford didn't happen to be in the same community, would the series even be competitive enough to continue?
No, it was not one of Trimble's better teams. The point is, while Trimble is a good program, but there is nothing about The Tomcats to suggest Fort Frye would be scared to play them. Fort Frye beat Waterford by 30. Waterford beat Trimble, Why in the world would The Cadets be scared of Trimble? Fort Frye has recently traveled to play Lima Central Catholic, Steubenville Central, Wheeling Central, Linsley, and were signed to go play St. Henry before St. Henry backed out. You think they are scared of Trimble and Nelsonville York? Seriously?
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: D6 23: 5. Waterford (9-2) @ 4. Fort Frye (8-3)
What are you talking about lol? Fort played the 12th best schedule in the state according to Drew Pastuer. Fort would love to play those teams. They dropped Fort. Last time NY played in Beverly it was like 63-20. They dropped us claiming they only wanted to play on Turf non league then they picked up Waterford.NotFunnyAtAll wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 1:25 pmYeah teams that FF played too. Belpre and Harrison central. But FF didn’t want to play teams like Nelsonville York and Trimble.efarns wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 1:12 pmWas that when they started their TVC schedule? Funny how that happensNotFunnyAtAll wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 12:25 pm
Why are we worried about the past years. The almost unstoppable offense has been on a roll sense week 4. Waterford has found there identity and they will continue to be almost unstoppable.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: D6 23: 5. Waterford (9-2) @ 4. Fort Frye (8-3)
lolMuffler wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 1:39 pmGreat! Now show the numbers of boys in each school and let’s compare! I’m sure you’ll be happy to see me back ole bubEasternDspy wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 10:40 pm Battle for the River
08- FORT FRYE 14 Waterford 0
09- FORT FRYE 35 Waterford 6
10- FORT FRYE 27 Waterford 0
11- FORT FRYE 34 Waterford 0
12- FORT FRYE 63 Waterford 13
13- FORT FRYE 47 Waterford 0
14- FORT FRYE 36 Waterford 6
15- FORT FRYE 27 Waterford 0
16- FORT FRYE 35 Waterford 14
17- FORT FRYE 23 Waterford 19
18- FORT FRYE 22 Waterford 20
19- FORT FRYE 49 Waterford 0
20- FORT FRYE 22 Waterford 6
21- FORT FRYE 39 Waterford 14
22- FORT FRYE 49 Waterford 19
23- FORT FRYE 16 Waterford 0
24- FORT FRYE 35 Waterford 7
Fort Frye 17-0
Points Scored 573 33.7
Points allowed 124 7.2
Playoff win trumps all this.
Waterford has had more football players the last 3 years.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: D6 23: 5. Waterford (9-2) @ 4. Fort Frye (8-3)
You have no idea what you’re talking about. Fort tried to schedule Trimble for years. They went to Trimble and dominated then. Then next year Trimble didn’t have to come to Fort Frye because of covid.NotFunnyAtAll wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 2:29 pmVery funny. FF didn’t want to play Trimble when they were the powerhouse they were. They got Trimble on the worst season they had in a decade. But you guys and your big heads got a different team coming Friday so all boys better be ready.efarns wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 2:16 pm****eye roll***NotFunnyAtAll wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 1:25 pm
Yeah teams that FF played too. Belpre and Harrison central. But FF didn’t want to play teams like Nelsonville York and Trimble.
Nelsonville famously ended the series with Fort Frye because, according to one of their fans, they "didn't want to play on grass" - after two bad losses. Fort Frye played Trimble once, and it was a Fort Frye blowout. Waterford plays a division 7 schedule, hasn't beaten The Cadets in over a decade. If Waterford didn't happen to be in the same community, would the series even be competitive enough to continue?
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: D6 23: 5. Waterford (9-2) @ 4. Fort Frye (8-3)
In 2021 Fort beat Trimble 45-13. That was far from the worst Trimble team they went 8-2 and beat Waterford 34-7.
Re: D6 23: 5. Waterford (9-2) @ 4. Fort Frye (8-3)
Waterford fans seem to feel like they need to prove something to us. Honestly . . . Waterford has never wanted to join The Fort Frye district so they could keep their community school. I get it. They do a great job being a community school and I have mad respect for everything they accomplish. It's an academically strong district, good families, and they are great against other schools in their category. But on the sports field, against Fort Frye the numbers speak for themselves. Over time, it has not been a close "rivalry" at all.Muffler wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 2:21 pmOr the fact the schools are 2 minutes apart is why it will forever be a rivalry.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: D6 23: 5. Waterford (9-2) @ 4. Fort Frye (8-3)
Schedule strength is updated weekly on fantastic 50. Fort finished with 21st best schedule in D6 and Waterford was 79th. The game is at Fort Frye because Fort had more Harbin points when 1 less win than Waterford had with 8.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: D6 23: 5. Waterford (9-2) @ 4. Fort Frye (8-3)
I have tons of Waterford friends this is great for our community.
-
- Riding the Bench
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2021 11:54 am
Re: D6 23: 5. Waterford (9-2) @ 4. Fort Frye (8-3)
Here we go again with the past record. It’s playoff season baby and the wildcats are coming to ruin dreams. We don’t need to get started about recruiting players either or OSHAA will get into itefarns wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 2:47 pmOkay? Maybe. So you'd be 1-17 against Fort Frye in recent history.NotFunnyAtAll wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 2:29 pmVery funny. FF didn’t want to play Trimble when they were the powerhouse they were. They got Trimble on the worst season they had in a decade. But you guys and your big heads got a different team coming Friday so all boys better be ready.efarns wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 2:16 pm
****eye roll***
Nelsonville famously ended the series with Fort Frye because, according to one of their fans, they "didn't want to play on grass" - after two bad losses. Fort Frye played Trimble once, and it was a Fort Frye blowout. Waterford plays a division 7 schedule, hasn't beaten The Cadets in over a decade. If Waterford didn't happen to be in the same community, would the series even be competitive enough to continue?
No, it was not one of Trimble's better teams. The point is, while Trimble is a good program, but there is nothing about The Tomcats to suggest Fort Frye would be scared to play them. Fort Frye beat Waterford by 30. Waterford beat Trimble, Why in the world would The Cadets be scared of Trimble? Fort Frye has recently traveled to play Lima Central Catholic, Steubenville Central, Wheeling Central, Linsley, and were signed to go play St. Henry before St. Henry backed out. You think they are scared of Trimble and Nelsonville York? Seriously?
-
- Riding the Bench
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2021 11:54 am
Re: D6 23: 5. Waterford (9-2) @ 4. Fort Frye (8-3)
I don’t know if you know what you’re talking about. When did you play football or you are just the stats lover boyEasternDspy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 2:55 pmYou have no idea what you’re talking about. Fort tried to schedule Trimble for years. They went to Trimble and dominated then. Then next year Trimble didn’t have to come to Fort Frye because of covid.NotFunnyAtAll wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 2:29 pmVery funny. FF didn’t want to play Trimble when they were the powerhouse they were. They got Trimble on the worst season they had in a decade. But you guys and your big heads got a different team coming Friday so all boys better be ready.efarns wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 2:16 pm
****eye roll***
Nelsonville famously ended the series with Fort Frye because, according to one of their fans, they "didn't want to play on grass" - after two bad losses. Fort Frye played Trimble once, and it was a Fort Frye blowout. Waterford plays a division 7 schedule, hasn't beaten The Cadets in over a decade. If Waterford didn't happen to be in the same community, would the series even be competitive enough to continue?
-
- Riding the Bench
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2021 11:54 am
Re: D6 23: 5. Waterford (9-2) @ 4. Fort Frye (8-3)
EasternDspy wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 2:53 pmlolMuffler wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 1:39 pmGreat! Now show the numbers of boys in each school and let’s compare! I’m sure you’ll be happy to see me back ole bubEasternDspy wrote: ↑Fri Nov 01, 2024 10:40 pm Battle for the River
08- FORT FRYE 14 Waterford 0
09- FORT FRYE 35 Waterford 6
10- FORT FRYE 27 Waterford 0
11- FORT FRYE 34 Waterford 0
12- FORT FRYE 63 Waterford 13
13- FORT FRYE 47 Waterford 0
14- FORT FRYE 36 Waterford 6
15- FORT FRYE 27 Waterford 0
16- FORT FRYE 35 Waterford 14
17- FORT FRYE 23 Waterford 19
18- FORT FRYE 22 Waterford 20
19- FORT FRYE 49 Waterford 0
20- FORT FRYE 22 Waterford 6
21- FORT FRYE 39 Waterford 14
22- FORT FRYE 49 Waterford 19
23- FORT FRYE 16 Waterford 0
24- FORT FRYE 35 Waterford 7
Fort Frye 17-0
Points Scored 573 33.7
Points allowed 124 7.2
Playoff win trumps all this.
Waterford has had more football players the last 3 years.
Irrelevant to the fact of number of boys in the school.
Re: D6 23: 5. Waterford (9-2) @ 4. Fort Frye (8-3)
You're the one who brought up Nelsonville and Trimble. You obviously don't know what you're talking about on that front.NotFunnyAtAll wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 3:09 pmHere we go again with the past record. It’s playoff season baby and the wildcats are coming to ruin dreams. We don’t need to get started about recruiting players either or OSHAA will get into itefarns wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 2:47 pmOkay? Maybe. So you'd be 1-17 against Fort Frye in recent history.NotFunnyAtAll wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 2:29 pm
Very funny. FF didn’t want to play Trimble when they were the powerhouse they were. They got Trimble on the worst season they had in a decade. But you guys and your big heads got a different team coming Friday so all boys better be ready.
No, it was not one of Trimble's better teams. The point is, while Trimble is a good program, but there is nothing about The Tomcats to suggest Fort Frye would be scared to play them. Fort Frye beat Waterford by 30. Waterford beat Trimble, Why in the world would The Cadets be scared of Trimble? Fort Frye has recently traveled to play Lima Central Catholic, Steubenville Central, Wheeling Central, Linsley, and were signed to go play St. Henry before St. Henry backed out. You think they are scared of Trimble and Nelsonville York? Seriously?
I have every confidence Waterford will be better than they were in week 4.
-
- Riding the Bench
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2021 11:54 am
Re: D6 23: 5. Waterford (9-2) @ 4. Fort Frye (8-3)
These boys get to butthurt to easily. They gotta take a chill pill cuz they go crazy.Chaw wrote: ↑Mon Nov 04, 2024 7:10 am Do you honestly think that i meant that. Sarcasm is hard to detect sometimes. I was simply demonstrating bias we both have for our teams when I commented that. This is what makes a rivalry healthy. This is what makes a game exciting to watch. I do hope that billboard material you are talking about distracts them in that way though. Coleton, Max, Treven, Zavier, and several others will have a great game if so.