Portsmouth Track

User avatar
noreply66
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 286334
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 8:39 pm
Location: Logan, Ohio

Post by noreply66 »

Getting off the Portsmouth track here --McCort ran a 43.3 last year as a freshman I think


5kdude
Varsity
Posts: 462
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 8:29 pm

Post by 5kdude »

noreply66 wrote:Getting off the Portsmouth track here --McCort ran a 43.3 last year as a freshman I think


i think he did to but i think that ruff ran faster then mcCort did last year.


User avatar
noreply66
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 286334
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 8:39 pm
Location: Logan, Ohio

Post by noreply66 »

The best time for Ruff that I could find was 43.6---McCort started off great then sort of went down some---do you know if he was hurt?


5kdude
Varsity
Posts: 462
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 8:29 pm

Post by 5kdude »

noreply66 wrote:The best time for Ruff that I could find was 43.6---McCort started off great then sort of went down some---do you know if he was hurt?


no he was not hurt. the coachs foind out that he could run the 800 pretty good so he was doing more of the 800 then the 300.


sportfan
Waterboy
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 4:46 pm

Post by sportfan »

Malik White from portsmouth ran 41.9 at reginals


roy
Waterboy
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 8:07 pm

Post by roy »

the way it sounds p-town will be a strong team.... couple good sprinters and relays


runhallerun
Freshman Team
Posts: 169
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2007 7:46 am

Post by runhallerun »

OK! Good luck Ptown!


5kdude
Varsity
Posts: 462
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 8:29 pm

Post by 5kdude »

roy wrote:the way it sounds p-town will be a strong team.... couple good sprinters and relays

i hope they are going to do good but it is sad to see some good runner then not do good as a team so i hope you guys do good.


User avatar
mustang_lvr
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 45784
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 10:45 pm

Re: Portsmouth Track

Post by mustang_lvr »

Portsmouth did have a good showing this year and should even be better next year.


Post Reply

Return to “Track & Field”