Oak hill defeats Minford DEC. 14
- Judge Smales
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 197
- Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 11:07 am
-
- SEOPS HO
- Posts: 9605
- Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 12:34 am
- Location: On The Ridge
Minford by game seems to have figured out getting over the hump......but if they get at it defensively they wouldn't have given up 70+ points on average in their first 3 games....including Jackson.
I think you need to relook at the stats. Sure, they gave up 71 to Jackson and 79 to Portsmouth (in OT), but they have since only given up 54 to the Burg, 43 to Clay, and 45 to West for a 58.4 average. I'd say football helped contribute to those first two scores since they got a late start because of the playoffs, just like the Burg did. Besides, if you look at the actual scores for Minford first three games they gave 68 points on avergae, not 70+.
I still think the Falcons will give the Oaks fits in this game.
"Welcome back my friends to the show that never ends"
- TheMalteseFalcon
- All Conference
- Posts: 889
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 11:04 pm
-
- S
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:29 pm
- UpOnTheHill
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 2:23 pm
-
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:49 pm
UpOnTheHill wrote:After watching Minford last night, I'll have to take the Oaks by 15+. I just don't think they will have an answer for our size.
Remember, Minford lead the entire game against Burg and probably held the rebounding edge until the last 4 minutes or so. Do not under estimate Minfords ability to compete being undersized. They are fundamentally a good defensive and rebounding team.
Oak Hill better shoot better than they did against Burg.
- toddboeckman4prez
- Riding the Bench
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2007 6:50 am
-
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:49 pm