Agreed on the backs from ND....Kayser and Johnson are good enough to start/play regular minutes for any school in the county. Oak Hill will have much more depth than ND though and that's what will be the difference in this game.*Mailman wrote:He wasn't bashing the kid. He was bashing you. Saying he was a track star in junior high and correlating that into football potential. I'm sure he's a terrific kid and a fine football player. But your reasoning behind it, was to say the least, a little on the crazy dad side. I watched OH play Minford. OH should have won that game. Minford is way down this year. But no one on OH stood out to me as great running back. I have seen the backs from ND run and they are very good and fast. Maybe he is just as good if not better. But his track prowess has nothing to do with it. Good luck to both teams. I hope for a good game and injury free.smelltheturf wrote:What's the purpose of getting on here to bash kids the kid is only a sophomore and has loads of talent that whole class does by their senior year they will be right up there with the 2011 class. All I'm saying is oak hill has to many skill players on offense with a half way decent line for them not to come out on top and they haven't lost to thhat bad of teams minford was a fluke should have came out on top rock hill and Peake were just to much for the oaks but Notre dame is not.
Oak Hill 32 Notre Dame 24
-
- SEO
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:53 pm
Re: Week 5: (3-1) Notre Dame @ (1-3) Oak Hill
Last edited by art_vandelay on Thu Sep 22, 2016 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Week 5: (3-1) Notre Dame @ (1-3) Oak Hill
I think you mean Kayser instead of Bowman. I'll take him any day of the week as you said, he can play anywhere in my opinion. The line could be the x factor of this game. Can ND play with them for 4 quarters? Only time will tell.art_vandelay wrote:Agreed on the backs from ND....Bowman and Johnson are good enough to start/play regular minutes for any school in the county. Oak Hill will have much more depth than ND though and that's what will be the difference in this game.*Mailman wrote:He wasn't bashing the kid. He was bashing you. Saying he was a track star in junior high and correlating that into football potential. I'm sure he's a terrific kid and a fine football player. But your reasoning behind it, was to say the least, a little on the crazy dad side. I watched OH play Minford. OH should have won that game. Minford is way down this year. But no one on OH stood out to me as great running back. I have seen the backs from ND run and they are very good and fast. Maybe he is just as good if not better. But his track prowess has nothing to do with it. Good luck to both teams. I hope for a good game and injury free.smelltheturf wrote:What's the purpose of getting on here to bash kids the kid is only a sophomore and has loads of talent that whole class does by their senior year they will be right up there with the 2011 class. All I'm saying is oak hill has to many skill players on offense with a half way decent line for them not to come out on top and they haven't lost to thhat bad of teams minford was a fluke should have came out on top rock hill and Peake were just to much for the oaks but Notre dame is not.
smelltheturf needs to rest up and get dinner ready for his son...
-
- SEO
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:53 pm
Re: Week 5: (3-1) Notre Dame @ (1-3) Oak Hill
jst722: Lol...yep, good catch. Kayser is fun to watch on the basketball court as well. Agreed on the 4 quarters part...that's the question for ND all year long with the small roster.*