Oak Hill 32 Notre Dame 24

art_vandelay
SEO
Posts: 2621
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:53 pm

Re: Week 5: (3-1) Notre Dame @ (1-3) Oak Hill

Post by art_vandelay »

Mailman wrote:
smelltheturf wrote:What's the purpose of getting on here to bash kids the kid is only a sophomore and has loads of talent that whole class does by their senior year they will be right up there with the 2011 class. All I'm saying is oak hill has to many skill players on offense with a half way decent line for them not to come out on top and they haven't lost to thhat bad of teams minford was a fluke should have came out on top rock hill and Peake were just to much for the oaks but Notre dame is not.
He wasn't bashing the kid. He was bashing you. Saying he was a track star in junior high and correlating that into football potential. I'm sure he's a terrific kid and a fine football player. But your reasoning behind it, was to say the least, a little on the crazy dad side. I watched OH play Minford. OH should have won that game. Minford is way down this year. But no one on OH stood out to me as great running back. I have seen the backs from ND run and they are very good and fast. Maybe he is just as good if not better. But his track prowess has nothing to do with it. Good luck to both teams. I hope for a good game and injury free.
Agreed on the backs from ND....Kayser and Johnson are good enough to start/play regular minutes for any school in the county. Oak Hill will have much more depth than ND though and that's what will be the difference in this game.*
Last edited by art_vandelay on Thu Sep 22, 2016 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
js7_22
Varsity
Posts: 529
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2012 11:41 am
Location: Southern Ohio

Re: Week 5: (3-1) Notre Dame @ (1-3) Oak Hill

Post by js7_22 »

art_vandelay wrote:
Mailman wrote:
smelltheturf wrote:What's the purpose of getting on here to bash kids the kid is only a sophomore and has loads of talent that whole class does by their senior year they will be right up there with the 2011 class. All I'm saying is oak hill has to many skill players on offense with a half way decent line for them not to come out on top and they haven't lost to thhat bad of teams minford was a fluke should have came out on top rock hill and Peake were just to much for the oaks but Notre dame is not.
He wasn't bashing the kid. He was bashing you. Saying he was a track star in junior high and correlating that into football potential. I'm sure he's a terrific kid and a fine football player. But your reasoning behind it, was to say the least, a little on the crazy dad side. I watched OH play Minford. OH should have won that game. Minford is way down this year. But no one on OH stood out to me as great running back. I have seen the backs from ND run and they are very good and fast. Maybe he is just as good if not better. But his track prowess has nothing to do with it. Good luck to both teams. I hope for a good game and injury free.
Agreed on the backs from ND....Bowman and Johnson are good enough to start/play regular minutes for any school in the county. Oak Hill will have much more depth than ND though and that's what will be the difference in this game.*
I think you mean Kayser instead of Bowman. I'll take him any day of the week as you said, he can play anywhere in my opinion. The line could be the x factor of this game. Can ND play with them for 4 quarters? Only time will tell.

smelltheturf needs to rest up and get dinner ready for his son...


art_vandelay
SEO
Posts: 2621
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:53 pm

Re: Week 5: (3-1) Notre Dame @ (1-3) Oak Hill

Post by art_vandelay »

jst722: Lol...yep, good catch. Kayser is fun to watch on the basketball court as well. Agreed on the 4 quarters part...that's the question for ND all year long with the small roster.*


Post Reply

Return to “Football”