Waterford at Fed Hock, 2/1

g w mclintock · Post by **g w mclintock** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:30 am

im going to bed now i guess i will have to wait until morning to read tid's comments on the game and why waterford played so poorly eventhough they were the superior team

Steely Dan · Post by **Steely Dan** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:58 am

and im going to bed as well, not knowing the infinite wisdom of tid and the rest of his/her cronies.

concerning the showing of the remainder of the the year, we will see..

throwitdown · Post by **throwitdown** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 4:13 am

Good win Federal Hocking. The lancers out played the wildcats in every phase of the game. Federal Hocking is really well coached that was evident in this ballgame. Waterford had a week to get ready for this game and thats all the better effort they came up with, rediculous!! I was wrong steely dan and freethow sorry fed hock does have a good ball team good luck in the tournaments!!

freethrow · Post by **freethrow** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 7:26 am

good luck to you and the wildcats also throwitdown

g w mclintock · Post by **g w mclintock** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 9:37 am

throwitdown wrote:Good win Federal Hocking. The lancers out played the wildcats in every phase of the game. Federal Hocking is really well coached that was evident in this ballgame. Waterford had a week to get ready for this game and thats all the better effort they came up with, rediculous!! I was wrong steely dan and freethow sorry fed hock does have a good ball team good luck in the tournaments!!

It takes courage to admit when you are wrong and I admire that. Next time be careful what you post. The HAHAHA stuff was a little over the top. I was told that your comments were read to the team in the locker room prior to the game. I don't think the Lancers needed any extra motivation.

Good Luck to the Wildcats the rest of the way and into the tourneys.

g w mclintock · Post by **g w mclintock** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:10 am

Remember_The_Name wrote:lol RANDOMGUY I Llike the comparisons lol looks like youve been studying... lol but i say Waterford by 4

SD-
Our old friend RTN kinda missed this one too. I bet he hopes we forget this prediction. LOL

Steely Dan · Post by **Steely Dan** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 1:02 pm

GW -

I'm a little more forgiving of RTN's miss. But, I will certainly remind him of his erroneous prediction when I do see him. LOL!

bigsportsfan · Post by **bigsportsfan** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 6:29 pm

RANDOMGUY wrote:I must apologize for my disappearing act this season.

The first meeting between these teams, I was there, Waterford showed alot of signs of early season confusion, both off. and def. against Fed Hock.

Make no mistakes, WATERFORD HAD THE GAME WON!!!

Two turnovers in the last minute by a backup gaurd, or Waterford holds on.

This game comes down to the following.

Home court-Fed Hock
Coaching-Tie
Talent-Waterford
Most Black Shirts-Fed Hock
Best Looking Cheerleaders-Fed Hock
Tallest Kid-Waterford
Most Players Posting on SEOP-Waterford
Biggest Self Denial-Trimble

Overall - Coin Flip, No One By 15!?!

g w mclintock · Post by **g w mclintock** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 8:59 pm

bigsportsfan wrote:
RANDOMGUY wrote:I must apologize for my disappearing act this season.

The first meeting between these teams, I was there, Waterford showed alot of signs of early season confusion, both off. and def. against Fed Hock.

Make no mistakes, WATERFORD HAD THE GAME WON!!!

Two turnovers in the last minute by a backup gaurd, or Waterford holds on.

This game comes down to the following.

Home court-Fed Hock
Coaching-Tie
Talent-Waterford
Most Black Shirts-Fed Hock
Best Looking Cheerleaders-Fed Hock
Tallest Kid-Waterford
Most Players Posting on SEOP-Waterford
Biggest Self Denial-Trimble

Overall - Coin Flip, No One By 15!?!

bigsportsfan- Welcome to Seopreps.

And your point is?

Steely Dan · Post by **Steely Dan** » Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:08 pm

GW - I believe that the newbie is still trying to figure out the quote function, and how to type something after the quote...LOL!

Maybe BSF was just conducting a test, who knows!! :shock:

lancersfan · Post by **lancersfan** » Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:01 pm

Good Luck!! Only a few games left!!!

throwitdown · Post by **throwitdown** » Sun Feb 03, 2008 3:16 pm

Great win Fed Hock!! You guys can go a long way if you play with the effort showed vs. Waterford. You are much better than I thought. I wouldnt overlook the two road games next week, although Miller is really struggling. They are still usually though to beat at their place.

tubby · Post by **tubby** » Sun Feb 03, 2008 3:37 pm

Sorry to get off topic but........lancersfan -

What is your problem with rv?
I see where u keep putting them down just because none of them can dunk. When have u watched them play this year? I was just wondering.

throwitdown · Post by **throwitdown** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 1:32 am

Fed Hock was more ready to play in this game. They know our players as good as we do it seems. They scout, we dont. We cam out very flat. Didnt help that we played fort frye the next night because I know that was in the back of everyone's mind all week. But thats the AD's fault for scheduling like that. Fed Hock also has very good players. They play well together, shoot, handle the ball, and play very good defense. They are more athletic than I gave them credit for as well. They forced Waterford to play their game. That was the difference in this game, as well as foul trouble to two of waterfords key players. But it came down to Fed Hock took advantage of their mismatch, which is speed. While waterford failed to pound the ball inside and take advantage of its size. Waterford bounced back very well to beat a good fort frye team saturday night. Now, lets see how fed hock plays vs. Miller after such a big win.

g w mclintock · Post by **g w mclintock** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 8:34 am

Tubby wrote:Sorry to get off topic but........lancersfan -

What is your problem with rv?
I see where u keep putting them down just because none of them can dunk. When have u watched them play this year? I was just wondering.

Regardless of the name, I don't think lancersfan is from Federal Hocking.

Lancer_Fan · Post by **Lancer_Fan** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 11:30 am

That name is too similar to mine, too! Just remember I am LANCER_FAN!
Not lancersfan....THANKS!

tubby · Post by **tubby** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 11:47 am

I see that Lancer_Fan.

sball32 · Post by **sball32** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:12 pm

G W McLintock wrote:
Tubby wrote:Sorry to get off topic but........lancersfan -

What is your problem with rv?
I see where u keep putting them down just because none of them can dunk. When have u watched them play this year? I was just wondering.

Regardless of the name, I don't think lancersfan is from Federal Hocking.

I must say i agree GW.

Buxrnum1 · Post by **Buxrnum1** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:57 pm

Sounds like this must have been an exciting game? What was the deal with Cunningham getting a "T" and sitting the rest of the game?

So, how tall is the Vales boy and what grade is he in? Was a good game in the paint with those two???

rat · Post by **rat** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 1:28 pm

lancerfan sounds like some of the ignorant people from RV that post on here. It doesn't really matter if they beat RV, they can't match up with the peake.