Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
Frontier
Passing
Toby Minder 83
Rushing
Toby Minder 226
Joel Lewis 130
Rec
Passing
Toby Minder 83
Rushing
Toby Minder 226
Joel Lewis 130
Rec
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
Monroe Central
Passing
Jarret Hooper 356
Trey Duffey 113
Ryan LaFollette 103
Rushing
Bobby O'Donnell 157
Rec
Bobby O'Donnell 255
Ryan LaFollette 216
Passing
Jarret Hooper 356
Trey Duffey 113
Ryan LaFollette 103
Rushing
Bobby O'Donnell 157
Rec
Bobby O'Donnell 255
Ryan LaFollette 216
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
By yards Fort has leading Passer Engle 629, Rusher Lewis 922, and Rec Brady Carpenter 256
-
- Riding the Bench
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:45 am
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
Haven't watched Fort yet this year, so I have no idea how the play, but if all the stats go to the same kids, "should" be easier to game plan for... at least in theory lolEasternDspy wrote:By yards Fort has leading Passer Engle 629, Rusher Lewis 922, and Rec Brady Carpenter 256
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
Thereddragin wrote:Haven't watched Fort yet this year, so I have no idea how the play, but if all the stats go to the same kids, "should" be easier to game plan for... at least in theory lolEasternDspy wrote:By yards Fort has leading Passer Engle 629, Rusher Lewis 922, and Rec Brady Carpenter 256
They actually have multiple weapons in Lewis , Lochary, and Carpenter. They did lose Clay Baker but his backup ran for 80 yards last week.
-
- Riding the Bench
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:45 am
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
Waterford held him to 50 yards on 18 carries and still gave up 35 points.Thereddragin wrote:So shutting down Lewis wouldn't be enough?
-
- Riding the Bench
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:45 am
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
Like I said I haven't watched then yet, sounds like a balanced teamenigmaax wrote:Waterford held him to 50 yards on 18 carries and still gave up 35 points.Thereddragin wrote:So shutting down Lewis wouldn't be enough?
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
Thereddragin wrote:So shutting down Lewis wouldn't be enough?
I mean you put 9 in the box to shutdown Lewis and that opens up the counter to the slot backs and the play action to Carpenter. Lewis has made it look easy most games. Waterford shut down the middle run but it made the outside wide open and Baker and Lochary torched them.
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
Last season, Caldwell bottled up the running game pretty well, as did Fredrickstown. But they had very strong defensive lines. The playcallers do a good job of finding holes in the defense if you're just trying to shut down one thing.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
efarns wrote:Last season, Caldwell bottled up the running game pretty well, as did Fredrickstown. But they had very strong defensive lines. The playcallers do a good job of finding holes in the defense if you're just trying to shut down one thing.
This is a huge reason why the Cadets have been a 2nd half team in the Waterford and Northridge games.
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
Trail scores at the end of the game goes for 2 and misses it. Zeps win 27-26 in a shocker.
-
- Varsity
- Posts: 647
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 12:31 pm
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
1. Fort
2. Trail/Shenandoah
4. Caldwell
5. Central
6 frontier
This league is bad. Fort then not much else
2. Trail/Shenandoah
4. Caldwell
5. Central
6 frontier
This league is bad. Fort then not much else
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
Trail is still better than what people think trust me Shenandoah isn't the caliber of team as trail everything was working for Shenandoah that night if it's on a dry field trail wins by 20. Trail definitely has something to prove this week against Fort Frye and week 9 against Riverredskinwitness wrote:1. Fort
2. Trail/Shenandoah
4. Caldwell
5. Central
6 frontier
This league is bad. Fort then not much else
-
- SEOPS Mr. Ohio
- Posts: 18863
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:46 pm
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
Froggy801 wrote:Trail is still better than what people think trust me Shenandoah isn't the caliber of team as trail everything was working for Shenandoah that night if it's on a dry field trail wins by 20. Trail definitely has something to prove this week against Fort Frye and week 9 against Riverredskinwitness wrote:1. Fort
2. Trail/Shenandoah
4. Caldwell
5. Central
6 frontier
This league is bad. Fort then not much else
I'm sure if it was dry Trail would of probably scored more and probably win the game. That being said I heard from a few Trail people that they were physically dominated at times.
-
- Waterboy
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2016 9:46 pm
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
I was at the game and am a BT fan. We were not physically dominated at any point. Shenandoah scored on a kick return, and three long runs. Outside of that shenandoah went backwards. The wet field conditions slowed us down and made everyone even. From there shenandoah won the game.
-
- Freshman Team
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2016 8:31 pm
Re: Pioneer Valley Conf 2016
Idk if I'd exactly agree with they were physically dominated Shenandoah basically put all 11 guys within 10 yards of each other on offense and just kept running the ball and trail stopped it but just gave up a few big plays is allEasternDspy wrote:Froggy801 wrote:Trail is still better than what people think trust me Shenandoah isn't the caliber of team as trail everything was working for Shenandoah that night if it's on a dry field trail wins by 20. Trail definitely has something to prove this week against Fort Frye and week 9 against Riverredskinwitness wrote:1. Fort
2. Trail/Shenandoah
4. Caldwell
5. Central
6 frontier
This league is bad. Fort then not much else
I'm sure if it was dry Trail would of probably scored more and probably win the game. That being said I heard from a few Trail people that they were physically dominated at times.