Ironton 33 Rock Hill 14
Re: Ironton (3-3) @ Rockhill (5-1)
Good to see ironton gaining some steam after week 1 debacle
7-3 ???
7-3 ???
-
- SEOPS Hippo
- Posts: 104408
- Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 6:47 am
Re: Ironton (3-3) @ Rockhill (5-1)
Sad news for you.........Ironton doesnt steal any players.......they come to Ironton to play on their own....or mom and dad make them but to say Ironton steals players is wrong...........and that makes a hell of a lot more sense than what you try to justify ..........I have been around town too long to put up with comments like Ironton stealing some one's players.............wobycat wrote:I think he means that Ironton steals a lot of rock hill players, so it's rock hill vs rock hill. Makes sense
Re: Ironton (3-3) @ Rockhill (5-1)
All schools have kids transfer/move In and kids transfer/move out
Sometimes you gain talent sometimes you lose talent
It's is what it is
Sometimes you gain talent sometimes you lose talent
It's is what it is
-
- SEOPS Hippo
- Posts: 104408
- Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 6:47 am
Re: Ironton (3-3) @ Rockhill (5-1)
very true, but that is not stealing.............it is what it is...........Poo Bear wrote:All schools have kids transfer/move In and kids transfer/move out
Sometimes you gain talent sometimes you lose talent
It's is what it is
Re: Ironton (3-3) @ Rockhill (5-1)
I was just being coy but since you opened fire on me, I know personally that the tiger staff has offered players at other schools playing time and certain positions. Frankly I could care less but it's a true statement.BubbleGum Tiger wrote:Sad news for you.........Ironton doesnt steal any players.......they come to Ironton to play on their own....or mom and dad make them but to say Ironton steals players is wrong...........and that makes a hell of a lot more sense than what you try to justify ..........I have been around town too long to put up with comments like Ironton stealing some one's players.............wobycat wrote:I think he means that Ironton steals a lot of rock hill players, so it's rock hill vs rock hill. Makes sense
-
- SEOPS Hippo
- Posts: 104408
- Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 6:47 am
Re: Ironton (3-3) @ Rockhill (5-1)
sorry but I didnt open fire on you..........I have been around the staff a long time also and that may have happened but whose decision was it to transfer......the student or his parents.......I doubt very seriously a teenager can negotiate positions and playing time and frankly I could care less also.......wobycat wrote:I was just being coy but since you opened fire on me, I know personally that the tiger staff has offered players at other schools playing time and certain positions. Frankly I could care less but it's a true statement.BubbleGum Tiger wrote:Sad news for you.........Ironton doesnt steal any players.......they come to Ironton to play on their own....or mom and dad make them but to say Ironton steals players is wrong...........and that makes a hell of a lot more sense than what you try to justify ..........I have been around town too long to put up with comments like Ironton stealing some one's players.............wobycat wrote:I think he means that Ironton steals a lot of rock hill players, so it's rock hill vs rock hill. Makes sense
the key word to this whole discussion is "STEALING".........but glad you explained what another poster meant when he said steal or was it you that injected that word ........time for me to move on and be coy with someone else.....
-
- SEOPS Hippo
- Posts: 28648
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 5:14 pm
Re: Ironton (3-3) @ Rockhill (5-1)
What players would that be? Can you name any?wobycat wrote:I was just being coy but since you opened fire on me, I know personally that the tiger staff has offered players at other schools playing time and certain positions. Frankly I could care less but it's a true statement.BubbleGum Tiger wrote:Sad news for you.........Ironton doesnt steal any players.......they come to Ironton to play on their own....or mom and dad make them but to say Ironton steals players is wrong...........and that makes a hell of a lot more sense than what you try to justify ..........I have been around town too long to put up with comments like Ironton stealing some one's players.............wobycat wrote:I think he means that Ironton steals a lot of rock hill players, so it's rock hill vs rock hill. Makes sense
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 3187
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:45 am
Re: Ironton (3-3) @ Rockhill (5-1)
Isn't that kidnapping?wobycat wrote:Obviously the Tigers didn't actually steal a kid.
Re: Ironton (3-3) @ Rockhill (5-1)
Yes it would be kidnapping and no im not going to name a kids name. Are you crazy?
-
- S
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Thu Nov 12, 2015 7:47 am
- Location: Chicago
-
- Waterboy
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 3:54 pm
Re: Ironton (3-3) @ Rockhill (5-1)
Maybe a freshman running back that's being taken care of by the Tiger Clan?Tigercannon71 wrote:What players would that be? Can you name any?wobycat wrote:I was just being coy but since you opened fire on me, I know personally that the tiger staff has offered players at other schools playing time and certain positions. Frankly I could care less but it's a true statement.BubbleGum Tiger wrote:
Sad news for you.........Ironton doesnt steal any players.......they come to Ironton to play on their own....or mom and dad make them but to say Ironton steals players is wrong...........and that makes a hell of a lot more sense than what you try to justify ..........I have been around town too long to put up with comments like Ironton stealing some one's players.............
-
- Waterboy
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2016 8:28 pm
- Better Find Bob
- Waterboy
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 9:16 am
Re: Ironton (3-3) @ Rockhill (5-1)
Chokeapeake couldnt get it done last week. They did their best Logan impression at Tanks Memorial last week. Tigers will have a tougher test this week.
This will be a homecoming game for some of them Tigers.
This will be a homecoming game for some of them Tigers.
-
- SEOPS Hippo
- Posts: 28648
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 5:14 pm
Re: Ironton (3-3) @ Rockhill (5-1)
wobycat wrote:Yes it would be kidnapping and no im not going to name a kids name. Are you crazy?
That's cause you can't. Cause it doesn't happen. It's the same thing all the time people say when my sisters boyfriends brothers kid was recruited by Ironton. Then you ask for specifics and they say well a coach didn't talk to him, but a tiger fan that works with his dad/mom was talking to them about bringing their kid into Ironton. That's how it usually goes. That's not recruiting that's people just talking.
-
- All State
- Posts: 1377
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 10:48 am
Re: Ironton (3-3) @ Rockhill (5-1)
You could go to jail for that.wobycat wrote:Obviously the Tigers didn't actually steal a kid.
-
- SEOP
- Posts: 3187
- Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:45 am
Re: Ironton (3-3) @ Rockhill (5-1)
Not if they had a man with a plan.Manwithplan wrote:You could go to jail for that.wobycat wrote:Obviously the Tigers didn't actually steal a kid.