Waverly Vs. Oakhill 1/31

B-dawg79 · Post by **B-dawg79** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 4:54 pm

thoughts

toast · Post by **toast** » Mon Jan 30, 2012 5:26 pm

It's been a while since Waverly has beaten Oak Hill at Waverly. At 10-5 the Oaks are a good team and capable of winning just about anywhere they play. They took Valley to the wire and that was at Valley. That's saying something......

This is one of the most important games of the season for Waverly. Huge implications as far as tournament seeding and also staying in contention for a league title.

There is a lot riding on this game! Look for a high intensity affair and a much closer game than took place at Oak Hill. Imperative that Waverly plays with energy and be on top of their game.

Go Tigers!!!

The Ghost of Swanker · Mon Jan 30, 2012 5:44 pm

Waverly by 27

fan_of_swankerpine · Post by **fan_of_swankerpine** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:35 am

Waverly by as many as they want. Kretzer drops 35.

The Ghost of Swanker · Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:39 am

I'll pull a price is right move and say he drops 36.

Jump23 · Post by **Jump23** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 3:22 pm

If he drops that much he will be very close to being the all time leading scorer at waverly. He will have to shoot well tonight because more than likely the oaks will pack in a zone defense.

Bucknut27 · Post by **Bucknut27** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 8:58 pm

fan_of_swankerpine wrote:Waverly by as many as they want. Kretzer drops 35.

Oak Hill won 65-59.

Jesco White · Post by **Jesco White** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:01 pm

Bucknut27 wrote:
fan_of_swankerpine wrote:Waverly by as many as they want. Kretzer drops 35.
Oak Hill won 65-59.

Seriously?

Bucknut27 · Post by **Bucknut27** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:02 pm

Jesco White wrote:
Bucknut27 wrote:
fan_of_swankerpine wrote:Waverly by as many as they want. Kretzer drops 35.
Oak Hill won 65-59.
Seriously?

Yes, that was the final score. Big win for Oak Hill.

Skiisme · Post by **Skiisme** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:07 pm

Have not seen Oak Hill this year but I saw Waverly in Chesapeake. Thought Waverly would win that one.

Ironman92 · Post by **Ironman92** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:09 pm

Wanting the #5 seed?

Jesco White · Post by **Jesco White** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:23 pm

Ironman92 wrote:Wanting the #5 seed?

Might have just earned it

oneoak · Post by **oneoak** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:58 pm

According to Buzz on 97.7 FM, Oak Hill scored 32 in the fourth quarter including 13 of 13 foul shots.

MightyOaksFan · Post by **MightyOaksFan** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:15 pm

Can't wait to hear the comments after this one. I am sure it was the dirty play of the Oaks like in past years.

Ironman92 · Post by **Ironman92** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:21 pm

The refs sucked!

smurray · Post by **smurray** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:29 pm

17-17 FT's in the 4th to win it, Love with 11 of them. It was tied at 55 with 1:20 to play. Waverly lead 44-33 to srart the 4th.

Hitops2.0 · Post by **Hitops2.0** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:41 pm

smurray wrote:17-17 FT's in the 4th to win it, Love with 11 of them. It was tied at 55 with 1:20 to play. Waverly lead 44-33 to srart the 4th.

and the wheels on Waverly's bus fell off this time ...off this time ...off this time ...and the wheels on Waverly's bus fell of this time all through town ...........

makes the Valley game with the Oaks >>>BIG

SouthernohioSB · Post by **SouthernohioSB** » Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:50 pm

If waverly had a coach they could be great. I have seen them play a few times this year and just don't understand his coaching. At burg they had Kretzer playing outside and had a double digit lead. Then in second half put him in the post and burg double teamed him. I think he only had 4 points in second half. Burg took it to overtime. He has just had great players to cover his poor coaching.

Hitops2.0 · Post by **Hitops2.0** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 4:27 pm

Evaluator wrote:If waverly had a coach they could be great. I have seen them play a few times this year and just don't understand his coaching. At burg they had Kretzer playing outside and had a double digit lead. Then in second half put him in the post and burg double teamed him. I think he only had 4 points in second half. Burg took it to overtime. He has just had great players to cover his poor coaching.

heard that same thing from a Waverly fan last night that hasnt had a dog in fight for several years now .....he has not been popular for some time from what i hear through the vine

SOCFAN1430 · Post by **SOCFAN1430** » Wed Feb 01, 2012 4:39 pm

HItops wrote:
Evaluator wrote:If waverly had a coach they could be great. I have seen them play a few times this year and just don't understand his coaching. At burg they had Kretzer playing outside and had a double digit lead. Then in second half put him in the post and burg double teamed him. I think he only had 4 points in second half. Burg took it to overtime. He has just had great players to cover his poor coaching.

heard that same thing from a Waverly fan last night that hasnt had a dog in fight for several years now .....he has not been popular for some time from what i hear through the vine

Wow that's surprising to hear. What were the Waverly faithful saying about coaches who didn't make it to the Convo or won the classic?

SoutheasternOhioPreps.com

Waverly Vs. Oakhill 1/31

Waverly Vs. Oakhill 1/31

Re: Waverly Vs. Oakhill 1/31

Re: Waverly Vs. Oakhill 1/31

Re: Waverly Vs. Oakhill 1/31

Re: Waverly Vs. Oakhill 1/31

Re: Waverly Vs. Oakhill 1/31

Re: Waverly Vs. Oakhill 1/31

Re: Waverly Vs. Oakhill 1/31

Re: Waverly Vs. Oakhill 1/31

Re: Waverly Vs. Oakhill 1/31

Re: Waverly Vs. Oakhill 1/31

Re: Waverly Vs. Oakhill 1/31

Re: Waverly Vs. Oakhill 1/31

Re: Waverly Vs. Oakhill 1/31

Re: Waverly Vs. Oakhill 1/31

Re: Waverly Vs. Oakhill 1/31

Re: Waverly Vs. Oakhill 1/31

Re: Waverly Vs. Oakhill 1/31

Re: Waverly Vs. Oakhill 1/31

Re: Waverly Vs. Oakhill 1/31