WK 1 Ironton @ Wheelersburg

Post Reply
someoverkill
JV Team
Posts: 358
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 3:55 pm

Re: IRONTON/WHEELERSBURG. WEEK 1.

Post by someoverkill »

all 6 are north of Ironton :122249


bushmaster24
JV Team
Posts: 324
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:14 pm

Re: IRONTON/WHEELERSBURG. WEEK 1.

Post by bushmaster24 »

how did burg look in todays scrimmage?


User avatar
claypantherfan
All State
Posts: 1048
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 8:45 pm

Re: IRONTON/WHEELERSBURG. WEEK 1.

Post by claypantherfan »

I say Burg will win it


OZZIEOHIO
SEOPS HO
Posts: 8384
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 4:21 pm

Re: IRONTON/WHEELERSBURG. WEEK 1.

Post by OZZIEOHIO »

I am still undecided on this game. I took Burg in the upset for 3 years and was wrong, so last year I switched to Ironton and burg won. This one get me every year. Ill wait for Maddog to post the Cal preps prediction before I decide.


User avatar
Burgballer08
Waterboy
Posts: 32
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2008 11:10 pm

Re: IRONTON/WHEELERSBURG. WEEK 1.

Post by Burgballer08 »

Wheelersburg looked alright. defense was good (white is an animal) the offense struggled, but had some pretty good plays really need to work on the passing game, it will be really hard to run the ball all game. We need the pass to keep defenses of balance, we also need to keep the turn overs down way to many today. But for a 1st scrimmage not bad we didn't do very well in r 1st scrimmage last year and we had a good year so only time will tell.


BigOrangeOne
S
Posts: 1580
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 9:17 pm

Re: IRONTON/WHEELERSBURG. WEEK 1.

Post by BigOrangeOne »

I thought the offense was "less than stellar".


User avatar
86Tiger
JV Team
Posts: 314
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 1:15 am

Re: IRONTON/WHEELERSBURG. WEEK 1.

Post by 86Tiger »

I went to the WB scrimmage and I did not see the "speed" I have heard so much about. Seemed to me that they couldn't get past the Piketon D-line. And they never even came close to scoring. Speed ain't gonna help ya none if ya can't get past the line. I would almost be willing to bet (but I am not a betting woman) if they couldn't get past Piketon's line they sure ain't getting past Ironton's.

I also hate to tell you Burg fans Murphy ain't all you got to worry about. Ya'll can focus on Murphy if ya want to but the others will get ya while you are watching him. Noone has even mentioned White, Cramblitt, Webb, Monnig, and Lamb
Go ahead and underestimate the Tigers, see what happens to ya. I can't wait for this game. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


User avatar
PLEASANTFLYER
JV Team
Posts: 334
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 1:50 am

Re: IRONTON/WHEELERSBURG. WEEK 1.

Post by PLEASANTFLYER »

GO TIGERS!


User avatar
The Riepo Man
All Conference
Posts: 723
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 3:51 pm

Re: IRONTON/WHEELERSBURG. WEEK 1.

Post by The Riepo Man »

86Tiger wrote:I went to the WB scrimmage and I did not see the "speed" I have heard so much about. Seemed to me that they couldn't get past the Piketon D-line. And they never even came close to scoring. Speed ain't gonna help ya none if ya can't get past the line. I would almost be willing to bet (but I am not a betting woman) if they couldn't get past Piketon's line they sure ain't getting past Ironton's.

I also hate to tell you Burg fans Murphy ain't all you got to worry about. Ya'll can focus on Murphy if ya want to but the others will get ya while you are watching him. Noone has even mentioned White, Cramblitt, Webb, Monnig, and Lamb
Go ahead and underestimate the Tigers, see what happens to ya. I can't wait for this game. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


lol
Last edited by The Riepo Man on Sun Aug 10, 2008 5:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.


fbnut
SEOP
Posts: 3962
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 7:18 pm

Re: IRONTON/WHEELERSBURG. WEEK 1.

Post by fbnut »

never get to high or to low on your team based on a scrimmage. 2 a days really take away kids legs so I don't think I would judge the burgs speed and quickness until they get there legs back in week 1.


User avatar
86Tiger
JV Team
Posts: 314
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 1:15 am

Re: IRONTON/WHEELERSBURG. WEEK 1.

Post by 86Tiger »

Oh My did I get someone's dander up. Calm down boys :lol: Just throwing some stuff out there. It is so funny how the Burgites can tout their team and say what they want about the Tigers but if a Tiger fan says something good about the Tigers we are the "Debul". It's ok guys we'll just wait to see what happens. You will be surprized :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Go Tigers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Portsmouth98
All State
Posts: 1169
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 3:33 pm

Re: IRONTON/WHEELERSBURG. WEEK 1.

Post by Portsmouth98 »

I know 'Burg has some athletes back, but how is the line shaping up? I see some good size looking at last years returnees but there doesn't seem to be much after the first 5 or 6 kids. As for Ironton, they should be strong up front and have some fast backs, I look for them to make some major improvements this year. Overall, I'd say Ironton is the favorite but if the 'Burg can get an early lead and then use White to control the clock they have a legitimate chance for back to back wins.


BlindWhiteHat
SEOP
Posts: 3203
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 3:35 pm

Re: IRONTON/WHEELERSBURG. WEEK 1.

Post by BlindWhiteHat »

It just gets harder and harder to read some of the posts on here these days. :(


biggdowgg
SEOPS HO
Posts: 9074
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:44 pm

Re: IRONTON/WHEELERSBURG. WEEK 1.

Post by biggdowgg »

86Tiger wrote:I went to the WB scrimmage and I did not see the "speed" I have heard so much about. Seemed to me that they couldn't get past the Piketon D-line. And they never even came close to scoring. Speed ain't gonna help ya none if ya can't get past the line. I would almost be willing to bet (but I am not a betting woman) if they couldn't get past Piketon's line they sure ain't getting past Ironton's.

I also hate to tell you Burg fans Murphy ain't all you got to worry about. Ya'll can focus on Murphy if ya want to but the others will get ya while you are watching him. Noone has even mentioned White, Cramblitt, Webb, Monnig, and Lamb
Go ahead and underestimate the Tigers, see what happens to ya. I can't wait for this game. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:



didnt you all have a kid named Wetzel? or something like that?


backdoor54
Riding the Bench
Posts: 63
Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 2:00 pm

Re: IRONTON/WHEELERSBURG. WEEK 1.

Post by backdoor54 »

I went up to the scrimage for a bit friday night. The defense looked good, white played well at lb, and I thought that lang looked good playing defense. The secondary just needs to be coached more, that takes time and is a lot about scouting. The offense did look pretty lack luster, but defense comes before offense, and you also have to remember that hopper (te) and shank (rb) are the only two returning starters on offense. It isnt easy to throw in a new signal caller and all new linemen.. theyl be ok. As for not having the speed that is advertised, the speed was clearly there last night on the defensive side and when the got to stretch their legs. Craigmiles is legit 4.5 40 and walker and shankweiler can both move at around 4.6.. I know there IS a difference between football and track speed, but these guys are explosive athletes. IF the holes are there and the scheme is good enough to keep people off balance then they will turn 5 yd gains into 20 plus ydrs. The key week 1 will be leadership, not getting frusterated early, and not turning the ball over. I dont think anybody from burg will EVER understimate Ironton, but "you are only as good as your last performance". Hopefully burg play well in a couple of fridays and we can pull out a W


User avatar
86Tiger
JV Team
Posts: 314
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 1:15 am

Re: IRONTON/WHEELERSBURG. WEEK 1.

Post by 86Tiger »

[quote="biggdowgg"][quote="86Tiger"]I went to the WB scrimmage and I did not see the "speed" I have heard so much about. Seemed to me that they couldn't get past the Piketon D-line. And they never even came close to scoring. Speed ain't gonna help ya none if ya can't get past the line. I would almost be willing to bet (but I am not a betting woman) if they couldn't get past Piketon's line they sure ain't getting past Ironton's.

I also hate to tell you Burg fans Murphy ain't all you got to worry about. Ya'll can focus on Murphy if ya want to but the others will get ya while you are watching him. Noone has even mentioned [u]White, Cramblitt, Webb, Monnig, and Lamb[/u]
Go ahead and underestimate the Tigers, see what happens to ya. I can't wait for this game. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:[/quote]


didnt you all have a kid named Wetzel? or something like that?[/quote]

Yeah he is still there but he isn't on the D-line


ohbuckeye2
SEOPS HO
Posts: 8922
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 7:29 pm
Location: Ironton, OH

Re: IRONTON/WHEELERSBURG. WEEK 1.

Post by ohbuckeye2 »

biggdowgg wrote:
86Tiger wrote:I went to the WB scrimmage and I did not see the "speed" I have heard so much about. Seemed to me that they couldn't get past the Piketon D-line. And they never even came close to scoring. Speed ain't gonna help ya none if ya can't get past the line. I would almost be willing to bet (but I am not a betting woman) if they couldn't get past Piketon's line they sure ain't getting past Ironton's.

I also hate to tell you Burg fans Murphy ain't all you got to worry about. Ya'll can focus on Murphy if ya want to but the others will get ya while you are watching him. Noone has even mentioned White, Cramblitt, Webb, Monnig, and Lamb
Go ahead and underestimate the Tigers, see what happens to ya. I can't wait for this game. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:



didnt you all have a kid named Wetzel? or something like that?


Keith Wetzel is a JR 5'8 195 lb Fullback and a good one at that, I look for him to run the ball a little more this year than he did last season.


User avatar
Derf_W
Riding the Bench
Posts: 88
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:36 pm

Re: IRONTON/WHEELERSBURG. WEEK 1.

Post by Derf_W »

If W'burg plays this season like they did last night against Piketon they're in for a long season, as this is the worst I've ever seen them. In my scouting report, I counted 6 turnovers and two INTs went for a TDs. So I had it Piketon 14-0. Really, I thought Piketon did their best when they went straight at them as their D-line is small, but quick. They did get a few sacks but did also get burnt on a screen. W'burg also seems a little blitz happy and Piketon did get some big runs with the traps and counters. Ironton's bread and butter is smash mouth football and 'burg couldn't handle Piketon's brand of it, so in two weeks, it's gonna be a long night for the Pirates!
Last edited by Derf_W on Sun Aug 10, 2008 10:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.


biggdowgg
SEOPS HO
Posts: 9074
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:44 pm

Re: IRONTON/WHEELERSBURG. WEEK 1.

Post by biggdowgg »

I also hate to tell you Burg fans Murphy ain't all you got to worry about. Ya'll can focus on Murphy if ya want to but the others will get ya while you are watching him. Noone has even mentioned White, Cramblitt, Webb, Monnig, and Lamb
Go ahead and underestimate the Tigers, see what happens to ya. I can't wait for this game. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:[/quote]


didnt you all have a kid named Wetzel? or something like that?[/quote]

Keith Wetzel is a JR 5'8 195 lb Fullback and a good one at that, I look for him to run the ball a little more this year than he did last season.[/quote]



Thats what I heard aslo,,,thought maybe you was trying to keep it a secret :mrgreen: ...I wasnt saying anything untill they came to Ptown :lol:


User avatar
littlehornetsfan1214
JV Team
Posts: 300
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 9:31 pm

Re: IRONTON/WHEELERSBURG. WEEK 1.

Post by littlehornetsfan1214 »

ironton looks to well balanced this year. always a good game but see ironton winning by 17 pts.


Post Reply

Return to “Football”