WK 7 Jackson (5-1, 2-1) @ Ironton (3-3, 1-2)

Post Reply
User avatar
boogerred
All State
Posts: 1335
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 7:39 am

Re: WK 7 Jackson (5-1, 2-1) @ Ironton (3-3, 1-2)

Post by boogerred »

Yes, if everything else is even, size does matter.


galliagrad89
Freshman Team
Posts: 210
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 4:01 pm

Re: WK 7 Jackson (5-1, 2-1) @ Ironton (3-3, 1-2)

Post by galliagrad89 »

Ironton by 2 TDs.


Tigercannon71
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 28648
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 5:14 pm

Re: WK 7 Jackson (5-1, 2-1) @ Ironton (3-3, 1-2)

Post by Tigercannon71 »

KarlAgathon wrote:Size does matter...


Thats what she said.


ocho stinko
JV Team
Posts: 269
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2008 3:10 pm

Re: WK 7 Jackson (5-1, 2-1) @ Ironton (3-3, 1-2)

Post by ocho stinko »

Tigercannon71

You just had to say it didn't you!! :lol:


User avatar
loyaldevilfan
JV Team
Posts: 385
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:10 am

Re: WK 7 Jackson (5-1, 2-1) @ Ironton (3-3, 1-2)

Post by loyaldevilfan »

:122246


Tigercannon71
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 28648
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 5:14 pm

Re: WK 7 Jackson (5-1, 2-1) @ Ironton (3-3, 1-2)

Post by Tigercannon71 »

ocho stinko wrote:Tigercannon71

You just had to say it didn't you!! :lol:



Im sorry it was to perfect a moment to let it go bye.


ironman02
SEOP
Posts: 3148
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:09 pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Re: WK 7 Jackson (5-1, 2-1) @ Ironton (3-3, 1-2)

Post by ironman02 »

This topic went in a direction I didn't expect.

Couldn't listen to the Ironton game online last week. Was there some type of technical difficulty? Will this week's game be streaming live online? Don't think I'm gonna make it home for the game, so I'd like to listen online if at all possible.


User avatar
chilltown
JV Team
Posts: 333
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 11:11 pm

Re: WK 7 Jackson (5-1, 2-1) @ Ironton (3-3, 1-2)

Post by chilltown »

I don't think ITOWN........... can hold onto the football .... Jackson wins 20-13...since ITown thinks your 2 big a school so be it .......... :cry: l


grizzlynatural
Varsity
Posts: 641
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 1:58 pm

Re: WK 7 Jackson (5-1, 2-1) @ Ironton (3-3, 1-2)

Post by grizzlynatural »

Just way too many kids walking around the hallways of JHS for Ironton to compete with.

Jackson 28-17


User avatar
BUCKNUT79
Waterboy
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 10:12 pm

Re: WK 7 Jackson (5-1, 2-1) @ Ironton (3-3, 1-2)

Post by BUCKNUT79 »

Even though i am a tiger fan. I see it Jackson21 Tigers 13

Tigers with 4 fumbles


User avatar
tigermama
Varsity
Posts: 405
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 4:43 pm

Re: WK 7 Jackson (5-1, 2-1) @ Ironton (3-3, 1-2)

Post by tigermama »

Good luck Tigers!


old-timer
Freshman Team
Posts: 247
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 8:25 am

Re: WK 7 Jackson (5-1, 2-1) @ Ironton (3-3, 1-2)

Post by old-timer »

I will go with Jackson again this week, but like I said last week "Only if we give the correct QB the majority of the snaps." We saw the ability of our offense to control the football when we have a QB that can effectively run between the tackles with some power, but alot of quickness and balance. The short, controlled passing game played very effective for us as well. I would still like to see the difference in our defense's ability to be aggressive and shut down both pass and run by swapping Boggs and Meredith @ corner and safety. Boggs read routes and plays very well, but we play alot of man-to-man and it is tough to read with back towards the opponents QB.

Best of luck to the Ironmen!!!


User avatar
tl895
Varsity
Posts: 638
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 5:53 pm

Re: WK 7 Jackson (5-1, 2-1) @ Ironton (3-3, 1-2)

Post by tl895 »

any d*(& fool who thinks size doesnt matter in high school football is someone who is constantly playing smaller schools!! :122246 if it doesnt matter SOMEONE EXPLAIN TO ME WHY WE HAVE SIX DIVISIONS! why doesnt symmes valley play in cincy st x's division? any of you Einstein's out there got an answer for me! doubt it.


billcox
Varsity
Posts: 490
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 9:42 am
Location: SE Ohio

Re: WK 7 Jackson (5-1, 2-1) @ Ironton (3-3, 1-2)

Post by billcox »

tl895 wrote:any d*(& fool who thinks size doesnt matter in high school football is someone who is constantly playing smaller schools!! :122246 if it doesnt matter SOMEONE EXPLAIN TO ME WHY WE HAVE SIX DIVISIONS! why doesnt symmes valley play in cincy st x's division? any of you Einstein's out there got an answer for me! doubt it.


I don't think anyone on here has implied that size doesn't matter. I simply asked why the mindset of the Ironton faithful has changed so much over the past few years. What is it that is so different now compared to just 3-4 years back?


madpolecat
All State
Posts: 1300
Joined: Fri Oct 24, 2008 2:03 pm

Re: WK 7 Jackson (5-1, 2-1) @ Ironton (3-3, 1-2)

Post by madpolecat »

Only when you are gifted with size do you really believe that it doesn't matter...


User avatar
Army
S
Posts: 1736
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 2:25 am

Re: WK 7 Jackson (5-1, 2-1) @ Ironton (3-3, 1-2)

Post by Army »

chilltown wrote:I don't think ITOWN........... can hold onto the football .... Jackson wins 20-13...since ITown thinks your 2 big a school so be it .......... :cry: l


chilltown,

I disagree. The game is at the TANK and knowing just to well of being on that field myself, how intimidating it can be. If that was not so, explain last years game between our CAVS and the Fighting Tigers ON IT.

Two points:
1. Jackson's record on playing at the TANK.
2. The difference maker, Ironton's team plays to it's potential in front of their hometown fans this Friday.

Remember, Ironton blew Gallia Academy away on that field earlier this season. Jackson lost to Gallia Academy at Gallipolis. Sure, Ironton has been roughed up the past two weeks and they know it. They will be ready come Friday. Like I said in an earlier post. No disrespect to Jackson, but if I-Town gets the lead, they will not look back, but instead, they most likely will pile it on. With that said, anything is possible, especially in this SEOAL. Unfortunatley, the record speaks different. I am still going with Ironton in this one. I have a feeling, this game will not even be close. Maybe I am wrong, we won't know until the time has run off the score board to 0 seconds at the end of the 4th quarter. Then will we actually know. I believe if Ironton plays to there potential, this matchup between these two respected SEOAL Teams will be a redemption game for the Fighting Tigers come Friday at the TANK. :-D

Good luck to both respected SEOAL Schools.

May it be a safe and injury free played game with sportsmanship portrayed by both teams.
Last edited by Army on Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.


ironman02
SEOP
Posts: 3148
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:09 pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Re: WK 7 Jackson (5-1, 2-1) @ Ironton (3-3, 1-2)

Post by ironman02 »

Army wrote:

Remember, Ironton blew Gallia Academy away on that field earlier this season. Jackson lost to Gallia Academy at Gallipolis. [/color][/b]


Because comparing scores and common opponents is an exact science, right?

Let me give you an example from 2006.

Ironton 48 - Jackson 20
Chillicothe 47 - Ironton 14
Jackson 42 - Chillicothe 15

You may end up being right with your prediction, but justifying it with results from common opponents just isn't reliable. It's all about matchups and style of play.


loganlocos
SEOP
Posts: 4138
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:50 pm

Re: WK 7 Jackson (5-1, 2-1) @ Ironton (3-3, 1-2)

Post by loganlocos »

tl895 wrote:any d*(& fool who thinks size doesnt matter in high school football is someone who is constantly playing smaller schools!! :122246 if it doesnt matter SOMEONE EXPLAIN TO ME WHY WE HAVE SIX DIVISIONS! why doesnt symmes valley play in cincy st x's division? any of you Einstein's out there got an answer for me! doubt it.


No has said size doesn't matter.

But some of us have said that a lot of people make it into a bigger deal than it should be and use it as an excuse.

You don't see Steubenville whining about playing Watterson. You don't see Delphos St. Johns whining about size when they play Coldwater.

Those teams show up, play, and let the chips fall where they may.


User avatar
Army
S
Posts: 1736
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 2:25 am

Re: WK 7 Jackson (5-1, 2-1) @ Ironton (3-3, 1-2)

Post by Army »

ironman02 wrote:
Army wrote:

Remember, Ironton blew Gallia Academy away on that field earlier this season. Jackson lost to Gallia Academy at Gallipolis. [/color][/b]


Because comparing scores and common opponents is an exact science, right?

Let me give you an example from 2006.

Ironton 48 - Jackson 20
Chillicothe 47 - Ironton 14
Jackson 42 - Chillicothe 15

You may end up being right with your prediction, but justifying it with results from common opponents just isn't reliable. It's all about matchups and style of play.


That may be true. But I can't see our CAVS taking your team for granted this year like they did in 2006. :-D

They learned from over confidence. Last season was a great example, that's why the score was 21-7 with the CAVS taking a knee on the 4 yard line, instead of punching in another score to end the game on Hernnstein. :-D

Just like they did against Ironton last week taking a knee on the 6 yard line instead of punching in another score. :-D

I am still going with I-Town in this one, due to the style, match-up and hungry to give their fans a victory in the light of two past games being defeated by our Chillicothe Cavaliers last Friday and by Logan the week before.

Good Luck to both SEOAL Teams.


ironman02
SEOP
Posts: 3148
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:09 pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Re: WK 7 Jackson (5-1, 2-1) @ Ironton (3-3, 1-2)

Post by ironman02 »

You're ridiculous. Jackson executed their gameplan to perfection against Chillicothe in 2006 and destroyed them with their running game. Last season, Chillicothe did a better job of executing and they took care of the football, while Jackson did not. The Cavs deserved the win. I'm willing to give the Cavs credit for last year's win, but you still claim that Chillicothe lost in 2006 because they were overconfident, nothing more. I guess beating someone 42-15 and running for 500 yards isn't impressive enough for you.

That has nothing to do with this anyway. I gave an example that showed that common opponents isn't a reliable predictor of future results and then you start with your usual behavior again. I'm done talking to you because I don't want to ruin this thread. Save it for next week.


Post Reply

Return to “Football”