rosemount rebel wrote:first 5 games looks weak to get better you have to play better teams then this.....
I am sure the AD at Minford (Parkes) would be glad to speak to you concerning thism, if you are that concerned with the football schedule.
rosemount rebel wrote:first 5 games looks weak to get better you have to play better teams then this.....
Big Papi wrote:New schedule change for the falcons in 09'
From what iv'e heard this is how it goes...
River Valley Away
Wellston Home
Huntington Ross Home
Coal Grove Away
Oak Hill Away
Wheelersburg Home
West Away
Northwest Home
Waverly Away
Valley Home
The change was to break up the three w's.
rosemount rebel wrote:first 5 games looks weak to get better you have to play better teams then this.....
Big Papi wrote:I agree this years strength of schedule should be stronger than last years with almost all the teams improving.
Bleeding Red wrote:Big Papi wrote:I agree this years strength of schedule should be stronger than last years with almost all the teams improving.
Minford should be very solid this year. Definitely should be a playoff team, could make a run. They return Oesch, McCormick, Sloan, etc. They should be very dynamic in the backfield and have a solid line.
West returns several good players and should field a solid team, although they lost alot this year, they will be tough to beat.
Burg brings back tons at the skill positions, they should be much improved this year.
Valley has alot of talent coming back, and they played Minford and Burg tough last year.
Waverly has Roback, and if you cant stop him you are going to have fits keeping points off the board.
Should be a good race for the SOC championship this year for sure. There will be alot of great games.
Bleeding Red wrote:they still return alot of skill players, and, even in the rebuilding years, they seem to have a solid team and exceed expectations.
fbnut wrote:Bleeding Red wrote:they still return alot of skill players, and, even in the rebuilding years, they seem to have a solid team and exceed expectations.
Lang, shank, Cmiles, walker, thats a pretty good group of returning skill players. 7 returning starters on O, 8 returners on D and lang coming back on both D and O after missing the last 11 games in 08. I don't think I would classify 09 as a rebuilding yr for the burg.
marshallman wrote:fbnut wrote:Bleeding Red wrote:they still return alot of skill players, and, even in the rebuilding years, they seem to have a solid team and exceed expectations.
Lang, shank, Cmiles, walker, thats a pretty good group of returning skill players. 7 returning starters on O, 8 returners on D and lang coming back on both D and O after missing the last 11 games in 08. I don't think I would classify 09 as a rebuilding yr for the burg.
Cmiles and Walker didn't impress me that much. They never really got that many touches to say how good they really are. We keep hearing about C.miles having all this speed for two years now but it seems like he never gets the ball but 5 times a game? Lang, will have to wait and see if he is the same as before. Shank can run but he isn't a passing threat. Minford returns: 4 RB, QB, TE, 2-WR's who all played alot. They are deep at skill positions.
Incognito wrote:Glad to see Minford picked up scrimmages with Portsmouth and East. Although i did beleive South Point was a good scrimmage, Unioto was not so good.
Vladimir wrote:Who is Wheelersburg going to have to pound the ball as their FB? I read where people think kids like the FB/MLB White are a dime a dozen at the Burg, but I think he'll be missed. The other backs have alot of speed but being able to throw 10-15 body blows into another teams D-line is every important come te 4th quarter.
After watching the games on the zone this is what I thought won the two games these two played. Minford had their chances in both but didn't know how to seal the deal. White sealed it by pounding the ball which opened up holes for the other backs as Minford's D-line looked tired by the 4th quarter. Without White or a kid like him that can wear on a D-line I really don't see the other backs being a factor. One can have speed to get on the edge but a fresh defense will fence to the sideline with ease.
If Minford has everyone returning and all but one on offense were Jrs and Sophs they'll be tough, but they must get mentally disciplined enough to seal the deal and play 4 quarters of football to win the "big game," or it's going to be the same old same old.
Incognito wrote:Glad to see Minford picked up scrimmages with Portsmouth and East. Although i did beleive South Point was a good scrimmage, Unioto was not so good.
marshallman wrote:fbnut wrote:Bleeding Red wrote:they still return alot of skill players, and, even in the rebuilding years, they seem to have a solid team and exceed expectations.
Lang, shank, Cmiles, walker, thats a pretty good group of returning skill players. 7 returning starters on O, 8 returners on D and lang coming back on both D and O after missing the last 11 games in 08. I don't think I would classify 09 as a rebuilding yr for the burg.
Cmiles and Walker didn't impress me that much. They never really got that many touches to say how good they really are. We keep hearing about C.miles having all this speed for two years now but it seems like he never gets the ball but 5 times a game? Lang, will have to wait and see if he is the same as before. Shank can run but he isn't a passing threat. Minford returns: 4 RB, QB, TE, 2-WR's who all played alot. They are deep at skill positions.
sider wrote:Minford will have a lot of skill players left, but for a team predictated on the run they will have to build a line, which was were the most losses were this year. I think they return 2 lineman?