As a Football runner Shank and Eaton are a wash. But as a QB, Eaton far more advanced as a passer. I watched them both. I look for Shank to improve in that area this year, he's a heck of a competitor. As far as stats, the team stats for his year is all I could find. Eaton team pass yds was above 700 yds, Shanks Team was around mod 600's with Lang contributing to a few of those in the first game.
fbnut wrote:It's all a matter of opinion but I don't remember eaton having any bettter of a soph season than shank. Anyone have the stats from eaton's soph yr?
wobycat wrote:fbnut wrote:shank actually has more experience playing qb at the varsity level and I am not so sure that shank might not be a little faster, strength wise I am not sure there is that big a difference. I wouldn't judge either in the smarts deptartment, we haven't seen lang enough and shank was kind of thrown into the fire as a soph. Shank showed me a lot last yr in week 1. Most sophs would have p'd their pants having to come in, in week 1 against a team like ironton but he marched the burg down the feild in the closing minutes for the winning td. He continued to impress me as the season went on. People like to nitpick but the kid was a soph he will get better at everything. With the exception of c brown back in the early 80's I am not sure I have ever seen a soph qb play any better for the burg than shank did in 08. The team might be better off with shank at qb because it will allow the coaches to play lang at Lbacker on D. Lang is one heck of a D player and has a heck of a nose for the football. The team will be in good hands no matter who is taking the snaps.
Eaton was better than Shank his soph. year.