Would SOC allow Ironton and Portsmouth....?

Post Reply
User avatar
85inside
S
Posts: 1595
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 10:03 am

Would SOC allow Ironton and Portsmouth....?

Post by 85inside »

Would the SOC allow Portsmouth and Ironton to join their conference as non competing members? Now before anyone gets too excited hear me out.

If Ironton and/or Portsmouth would leave the SEOAL, it would be to either join another conference or go indy. Most likely indy, because of lack of conference opportunity. We would probably agree that the reason for keeping these two out would be past successes in football and basketball. Ironton and Portsmouth could bring some good gate revenues to most if not all of the SOC member schools. The close distance for Ironton and Portsmouth to play opponents would also help those two schools economically.

How about letting Ironton and Portsmouth join the SOCII and compete against all schools in the conference for scheduling, but not for title competition? If not allowed to join, these two schools would be indy and not competing for titles anyway. Scheduling would be easier, closer and gate receipts would be larger.

Another thought would be to maybe have some type of revenue share plan for the smaller conference schools. Maybe that would sway them to vote to allow them in the SOCII. Maybe the bigger schools could take $500 or so of their gate receipts and put into a pot and distribute it out to the smaller schools. Not much but it is something.


Bleeding Red
SEOPS
Posts: 6346
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 10:01 am

Re: Would SOC allow Ironton and Portsmouth....?

Post by Bleeding Red »

If they are part of the conference, they would compete in it for the conference title in each sport. Its just the way it is.

it would never work for them to be part of it and not be able to win the title....that would be a serious can of worms to open.


User avatar
85inside
S
Posts: 1595
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 10:03 am

Re: Would SOC allow Ironton and Portsmouth....?

Post by 85inside »

From the schools perspective, i dont think it would be anything, other than a way to schedule local games. The alternative is independent and you cant win a conference title that way either. it would benefit the conference teams by having a good, revenue generating school to play each year.

Lets face it, the only reason these two schools would be denied, is a perceived opinion that they would win the league every year. Take that element away and all you have left is good competition and a positive revenue stream for all schools. I dont see the negative here.

SOCII
Lucasville
West
Wheelersburg
Minford
Waverly
Portsmouth
Ironton

everyone would get 12 basketball games every year (home and home), 6 football games, 12 baseball games.


Ace
Freshman Team
Posts: 103
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 8:46 pm

Re: Would SOC allow Ironton and Portsmouth....?

Post by Ace »

How can you belong to a conference but not compete for a conference title? Doesn't that defeat the whole purpose?


User avatar
boilermaker
SE
Posts: 2216
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 6:21 am

Re: Would SOC allow Ironton and Portsmouth....?

Post by boilermaker »

Short and simple ,and to the point....NO :aaaaa15


ND TITANS
Waterboy
Posts: 38
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2008 8:31 am

Re: Would SOC allow Ironton and Portsmouth....?

Post by ND TITANS »

Talk about some good gates and less travel: Football Division

SOC- SUPER DIVISION

Ironton
Portsmouth
Wheelersburg
South Point
Portsmouth West
Rock Hill
Waverly

SOC- II

Fairland
Minford
Coal Grove
Lucasville
Oak Hill
Chesapeake
Piketon?

SOC-I

Notre Dame
Symmes Valley
East
Green
South Gallia
Manchester
Northwest

OTHER POSSIBILITIES SUPER DIVISION-
ASHLAND
RUSSELL
SOC II-Raceland
SOC I- Fairview

great for the fans, plus non conference could play interdivisional games


User avatar
Incognito
Varsity
Posts: 434
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 12:07 am

Re: Would SOC allow Ironton and Portsmouth....?

Post by Incognito »

ND TITANS wrote:Talk about some good gates and less travel: Football Division

SOC- SUPER DIVISION

Ironton
Portsmouth
Wheelersburg
South Point
Portsmouth West
Rock Hill
Waverly

SOC- II

Fairland
Minford
Coal Grove
Lucasville
Oak Hill
Chesapeake
Piketon?

SOC-I

Notre Dame
Symmes Valley
East
Green
South Gallia
Manchester
Northwest

OTHER POSSIBILITIES SUPER DIVISION-
ASHLAND
RUSSELL
SOC II-Raceland
SOC I- Fairview

great for the fans, plus non conference could play interdivisional games



This looks nice. You could also throw in sorta of a relegation system similar to the Premier League in England. The winner of SOC II would switch with the last place team of the Super Division or something similar to that.


Tartanblue
SEO
Posts: 2629
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:00 pm

Re: Would SOC allow Ironton and Portsmouth....?

Post by Tartanblue »

ND TITANS wrote:Talk about some good gates and less travel: Football Division

SOC- SUPER DIVISION

Ironton
Portsmouth
Wheelersburg
South Point
Portsmouth West
Rock Hill
Waverly

SOC- II

Fairland
Minford
Coal Grove
Lucasville
Oak Hill
Chesapeake
Piketon?

SOC-I

Notre Dame
Symmes Valley
East
Green
South Gallia
Manchester
Northwest

OTHER POSSIBILITIES SUPER DIVISION-
ASHLAND
RUSSELL
SOC II-Raceland
SOC I- Fairview

great for the fans, plus non conference could play interdivisional games


If that was done would rather see Fairview than Manchester in the SOC I then....


User avatar
Black@Orange
Freshman Team
Posts: 227
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 6:51 pm

Re: Would SOC allow Ironton and Portsmouth....?

Post by Black@Orange »

I'm sure that if Portsmouth or Ironton would win all there games. That we whould never hear on here, or see t-shirts in Portsmouth, saying who the "real" SOC champ is. Non the less I am from West and we use to play both. I think we can compete better now if we let Ironton in than in the past. It would make teams more prepared for the playoffs. You need to play up like Amanda Clearcreek can be .500 and make the playoffs. Not like Valley (in the past) go undefeated and stay home. Most teams already play Portsmouth anyway.


falconater
Freshman Team
Posts: 189
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 7:26 am

Re: Would SOC allow Ironton and Portsmouth....?

Post by falconater »

Football SOC

III
Gallia
Jackson
Waverly
Ironton
Portsmouth
Wheelersburg

II
Minford
West
Valley
NorthWest
Athens
Albany
Wellston
Oak Hill Maybe

I
Nd
SV
Green
South Gallia
SW
Manchester


D Owens
Freshman Team
Posts: 171
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 10:16 am

Re: Would SOC allow Ironton and Portsmouth....?

Post by D Owens »

Here is how the schools mentioned rank in terms of male enrollment. I didn’t look for numbers for Kentucky schools.


Jackson 378
Athens 340
Waverly 253
Gallia 247
North West 228
Rock Hill 222
Ironton 216
Piketon 216
South Point 216
Albany 207
Fairland 205
Wellston 198
Portsmouth 195
West 186
Wheelersburg 185
Minford 182
Valley 178
Coal Grove 166
Chesapeake 162
Oak Hill 133
SW 129 (No Football)
SV 124
Manchester 116
South Gallia 104
East 91
Green 81
Nd 38


bengalfan76
SE
Posts: 2138
Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 1:41 pm

Re: Would SOC allow Ironton and Portsmouth....?

Post by bengalfan76 »

Piketon would not leave the SVC for the SOC. Why do this?
I doesn't make sense. Your proposed division is no better than The SVC.
Especially in Baseball, Basketball, Girls sports.
ND TITANS wrote:Talk about some good gates and less travel: Football Division

SOC- SUPER DIVISION

Ironton
Portsmouth
Wheelersburg
South Point
Portsmouth West
Rock Hill
Waverly

SOC- II

Fairland
Minford
Coal Grove
Lucasville
Oak Hill
Chesapeake
Piketon?

SOC-I

Notre Dame
Symmes Valley
East
Green
South Gallia
Manchester
Northwest

OTHER POSSIBILITIES SUPER DIVISION-
ASHLAND
RUSSELL
SOC II-Raceland
SOC I- Fairview

great for the fans, plus non conference could play interdivisional games


User avatar
sider
All Conference
Posts: 985
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 8:59 pm

Re: Would SOC allow Ironton and Portsmouth....?

Post by sider »

Even though, Ironton and Portsmouth would probably, compete for the title year in and year out , but the past two years would have been an exception. Ironton has beaten by burg the past two years and may of lost to West this year. Portsmouth (who would have won at least a 1/3 of the title in 07), seems to have 1 or 2 very good teams followed by 1 or 2 down teams. I think with West, Waverly Minford, and Burg seeming to have a established programs (Burg has one), an Soc with Ironton and P-town would be closer than most think.


User avatar
YOU'RE TIGER BAIT
SEOPS Hippo
Posts: 25696
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 10:23 pm
Location: WAVERLY, OHIO

Re: Would SOC allow Ironton and Portsmouth....?

Post by YOU'RE TIGER BAIT »

i'd like to see ironton enter some kind of league. but again , i liked the seoal. in football. but i realize the travel problems for the other sports. zanesville or logan, on a week night for a basketball , or baseball game has the kids getting home extremely late. but then again , i've never believed in mandatory homework either. that would help. the teachers have these students all day, between homework, sports, meals, there is no time for a home life at all.


Post Reply

Return to “Football”