TheMalteseFalcon wrote:FIDO wrote:Oh, I forgot to mention the ARROGANCE of some from BOTH communtities certainly makes it easier for them to not get an invite!![]()
![]()
Which BOTH communtities (sic) ? Valley and Oak Hill ?
I thought 85I mentioned 4 non-SOC schools in his 1st post.... but now we're down to TWO ?
Valley Vs. Jackson
Portsmouth vs. Burg
Ironton vs. Waverly
Oak Hill vs. Chillicothe
Don't cha know that 85I only started this thread to "stir the pot" ?? He figured all the SOC followers would say.... HELL NO !!... because he figured they would all be skeered of his Tiggers. Talk about ARROGANCE !! (And I don't want to hear anything from the TIGGER fans because I85 referred to Ashland as the TomKITTENS on here just a few days ago). If ya can't take it, don't put it out.![]()
--------------------------
85inside Post subject: Re: IRONTON 60 VS Dawson-Bryant 35 - 2/27 - FINALPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:58 pm
Yea, thats why the Tomkittens are about 2-10 in their last 12 against ironton. The 16th region being so tough, is why only Ashland remains on the schedule and they only agree to play ironton once per year. It was great great back in the 60's and 70's when they had good teams over there. they always wanted to play ironton twice a year. Now none of them come around any more. Even Russell has dropped after being thoroughly dominated the past 5 seasons!
--------------------------
Way to go 85I. Proud of ya.
I talked to IMABIGGN and he is for this league :lol: